Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston.
Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.20675.
Understanding adverse effects of contemporary treatment approaches for men with favorable-risk and unfavorable-risk localized prostate cancer could inform treatment selection.
To compare functional outcomes associated with prostate cancer treatments over 5 years after treatment.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prospective, population-based cohort study of 1386 men with favorable-risk (clinical stage cT1 to cT2bN0M0, prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≤20 ng/mL, and Grade Group 1-2) prostate cancer and 619 men with unfavorable-risk (clinical stage cT2cN0M0, PSA of 20-50 ng/mL, or Grade Group 3-5) prostate cancer diagnosed in 2011 through 2012, accrued from 5 Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results Program sites and a US prostate cancer registry, with surveys through September 2017.
Treatment with active surveillance (n = 363), nerve-sparing prostatectomy (n = 675), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT; n = 261), or low-dose-rate brachytherapy (n = 87) for men with favorable-risk disease and treatment with prostatectomy (n = 402) or EBRT with androgen deprivation therapy (n = 217) for men with unfavorable-risk disease.
Patient-reported function, based on the 26-item Expanded Prostate Index Composite (range, 0-100), 5 years after treatment. Regression models were adjusted for baseline function and patient and tumor characteristics. Minimum clinically important difference was 10 to 12 for sexual function, 6 to 9 for urinary incontinence, 5 to 7 for urinary irritative symptoms, and 4 to 6 for bowel and hormonal function.
A total of 2005 men met inclusion criteria and completed the baseline and at least 1 postbaseline survey (median [interquartile range] age, 64 [59-70] years; 1529 of 1993 participants [77%] were non-Hispanic white). For men with favorable-risk prostate cancer, nerve-sparing prostatectomy was associated with worse urinary incontinence at 5 years (adjusted mean difference, -10.9 [95% CI, -14.2 to -7.6]) and sexual function at 3 years (adjusted mean difference, -15.2 [95% CI, -18.8 to -11.5]) compared with active surveillance. Low-dose-rate brachytherapy was associated with worse urinary irritative (adjusted mean difference, -7.0 [95% CI, -10.1 to -3.9]), sexual (adjusted mean difference, -10.1 [95% CI, -14.6 to -5.7]), and bowel (adjusted mean difference, -5.0 [95% CI, -7.6 to -2.4]) function at 1 year compared with active surveillance. EBRT was associated with urinary, sexual, and bowel function changes not clinically different from active surveillance at any time point through 5 years. For men with unfavorable-risk disease, EBRT with ADT was associated with lower hormonal function at 6 months (adjusted mean difference, -5.3 [95% CI, -8.2 to -2.4]) and bowel function at 1 year (adjusted mean difference, -4.1 [95% CI, -6.3 to -1.9]), but better sexual function at 5 years (adjusted mean difference, 12.5 [95% CI, 6.2-18.7]) and incontinence at each time point through 5 years (adjusted mean difference, 23.2 [95% CI, 17.7-28.7]), than prostatectomy.
In this cohort of men with localized prostate cancer, most functional differences associated with contemporary management options attenuated by 5 years. However, men undergoing prostatectomy reported clinically meaningful worse incontinence through 5 years compared with all other options, and men undergoing prostatectomy for unfavorable-risk disease reported worse sexual function at 5 years compared with men who underwent EBRT with ADT.
了解当代治疗方法对低危和高危局限性前列腺癌患者的不良反应,可以为治疗选择提供信息。
比较治疗后 5 年与前列腺癌治疗相关的功能结果。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项前瞻性的基于人群的队列研究,共纳入了 1386 名低危(临床分期 cT1 至 cT2bN0M0,前列腺特异性抗原[PSA]≤20ng/mL,分级分组 1-2)前列腺癌患者和 619 名高危(临床分期 cT2cN0M0,PSA 为 20-50ng/mL,或分级分组 3-5)前列腺癌患者。这些患者均于 2011 年至 2012 年在 5 个监测、流行病学和最终结果计划(SEER)站点和美国前列腺癌登记处被诊断出来,并通过 2017 年 9 月的调查进行随访。
接受主动监测(n=363)、保留神经前列腺切除术(n=675)、外照射放疗(EBRT;n=261)或低剂量率近距离放疗(n=87)治疗的患者患有低危疾病,而接受前列腺切除术(n=402)或 EBRT 联合雄激素剥夺治疗(n=217)治疗的患者患有高危疾病。
治疗后 5 年,患者报告的功能,基于 26 项扩展前列腺指数综合评分(范围:0-100)。回归模型根据基线功能和患者及肿瘤特征进行了调整。在治疗后 5 年内,尿失禁、尿失禁、尿激惹症状、肠和激素功能方面,有 10-12 个最小临床重要差异(MCID)、6-9 个 MCID、5-7 个 MCID 和 4-6 个 MCID。
共有 2005 名符合纳入标准的患者完成了基线和至少 1 次基线后调查(中位数[四分位间距]年龄:64[59-70]岁;1993 名参与者中有 1529 名[77%]为非西班牙裔白人)。对于患有低危前列腺癌的男性,与主动监测相比,保留神经的前列腺切除术在 5 年时的尿失禁(调整后的平均差异,-10.9[95%CI,-14.2 至-7.6])和 3 年时的性功能(调整后的平均差异,-15.2[95%CI,-18.8 至-11.5])较差。低剂量率近距离放疗与主动监测相比,1 年时尿激惹(调整后的平均差异,-7.0[95%CI,-10.1 至-3.9])、性功能(调整后的平均差异,-10.1[95%CI,-14.6 至-5.7])和肠功能(调整后的平均差异,-5.0[95%CI,-7.6 至-2.4])较差。EBRT 与 ADT 与主动监测相比,在任何时间点通过 5 年的尿、性和肠功能变化均无临床差异。对于患有高危疾病的男性,EBRT 联合 ADT 在 6 个月时的激素功能(调整后的平均差异,-5.3[95%CI,-8.2 至-2.4])和 1 年时的肠功能(调整后的平均差异,-4.1[95%CI,-6.3 至-1.9])较差,但在 5 年时的性功能(调整后的平均差异,12.5[95%CI,6.2-18.7])和尿失禁(调整后的平均差异,23.2[95%CI,17.7-28.7])较好。
在这项局限性前列腺癌男性队列研究中,与当代管理选择相关的大多数功能差异在 5 年内减弱。然而,与所有其他选择相比,接受前列腺切除术的男性在 5 年内报告的尿失禁情况更严重,而接受前列腺切除术治疗高危疾病的男性在 5 年内报告的性功能比接受 EBRT 联合 ADT 治疗的男性更差。