Cusimano Joseph, VandenBerg Amy
Ment Health Clin. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):18-24. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2020.01.018. eCollection 2020 Jan.
People with serious mental illness may be subjected to "court-ordered treatment" (COT), per the mental health statutes of their respective state. COT enforces adherence to a psychiatric treatment regimen and may involve involuntary medication administration. Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are frequently used in this setting, although little is known about the clinical effectiveness or patterns of use of these agents in the context of COT. Because psychiatric pharmacists are medication experts, we sought to characterize their perceptions and experiences on this topic.
A cross-sectional, electronic, 14-item survey was administered via the College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists listserv from October 9, 2018, to November 9, 2018. The survey collected demographic information, experience and use of LAI antipsychotics at each practice site, and perception of LAI antipsychotics.
Of 843 possible respondents, 72 completed the survey, yielding an 8.5% response rate. LAIs were perceived as underused or adequately used as a whole, with a significant difference in perception favoring the opinion that LAIs are underused versus overused for those respondents who perceived an adherence benefit ( = .042). We also found that LAIs were used disproportionately in the context of COT versus oral formulations ( = .03).
The use of LAIs in the context of COT has not been studied, and it may expose this vulnerable population to adverse effects from medications they are legally compelled to take. Further research on the perceptions of other interdisciplinary team members and the clinical impact of LAI use in COT is needed.
根据各自所在州的心理健康法规,患有严重精神疾病的人可能会接受“法院强制治疗”(COT)。COT强制患者遵守精神科治疗方案,可能包括非自愿给药。长效注射(LAI)抗精神病药物在这种情况下经常使用,尽管对于这些药物在COT背景下的临床疗效或使用模式知之甚少。由于精神科药剂师是药物专家,我们试图描述他们对这一主题的看法和经验。
2018年10月9日至2018年11月9日,通过精神科和神经科药剂师学院的邮件列表进行了一项横断面电子14项调查。该调查收集了人口统计学信息、每个执业地点LAI抗精神病药物的使用经验和使用情况,以及对LAI抗精神病药物的看法。
在843名可能的受访者中,72人完成了调查,回复率为8.5%。总体而言,LAI被认为使用不足或使用得当,对于那些认为LAI有依从性益处的受访者,在认为LAI使用不足与使用过度的看法上存在显著差异(P = 0.042)。我们还发现,与口服制剂相比,LAI在COT背景下的使用比例过高(P = 0.03)。
尚未对COT背景下LAI的使用进行研究,这可能会使这一弱势群体面临法律强制服用药物带来的不良反应。需要进一步研究其他跨学科团队成员的看法以及LAI在COT中的临床影响。