Department of Pediatric and Congenital Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 1;95(6):1149-1157. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28725. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
Results and outcomes of ductus arteriosus stenting vary widely. The aim of this study was to determine whether ductus morphology is associated with different procedural outcome.
Over an 18-year period, 123 patients presented with ductal dependent pulmonary blood flow. Results were retrospectively assessed based on radiographic anatomic features of the ductus arteriosus: Group 1: "straight" ductus arteriosus, typically seen in patients with Pulmonary atresia with intact septum (PA-IVS), Group 2: "intermediate" ductus arteriosus as seen in severe pulmonary stenosis (PS)-single ventricle, Group 3: "vertical" ductus arteriosus typically seen in patients with pulmonary atresia-ventricular septal defect, Group 4: ductus arteriosus arising from the aorta to a single lung, Group 5: ductus arteriosus arising from the innominate/subclavian artery to a single lung, Group 6: ductus arteriosus from innominate/subclavian artery to both lungs.
Ductal stenting (DS) was attempted in 98 patients with 99 ducts. Successful stenting was possible in 83 patients. Success of DS was significantly different among the groups (p = .04, F = 5.41). Groups 1, 4, and 5 were "easy" with good success while Groups 2, 3, and 6 were complex and demanding. There were two deaths (after 5 and 7 days, respectively) that could be ascribed to DS. Elective re-interventions were performed in 34 ductuses (40%). Fifty three percent (n = 44/83) of successful ductus stents proceeded to further surgery and 20 ducts closed spontaneously in asymptomatic patients over time.
Ductus arteriosus morphology influences technique and determines complexity, safety, and final outcome of ductus arteriosus stenting.
动脉导管支架置入术的结果和结局差异很大。本研究旨在确定动脉导管形态是否与不同的手术结果相关。
在 18 年的时间里,123 例患者出现导管依赖性肺血流。根据动脉导管的放射解剖特征,对结果进行回顾性评估:第 1 组:“直”动脉导管,通常见于肺动脉闭锁伴完整室间隔(PA-IVS)患者;第 2 组:“中间”动脉导管,见于严重肺动脉瓣狭窄(PS)-单心室患者;第 3 组:“垂直”动脉导管,通常见于肺动脉闭锁-室间隔缺损患者;第 4 组:动脉导管从主动脉起源至单肺;第 5 组:动脉导管从无名动脉/锁骨下动脉起源至单肺;第 6 组:动脉导管从无名动脉/锁骨下动脉起源至双肺。
98 例患者的 99 个动脉导管尝试进行了导管支架置入术(DS)。83 例患者的 DS 成功。各组之间 DS 的成功率差异有统计学意义(p =.04,F = 5.41)。第 1、4 和 5 组为“简单”,成功率高,而第 2、3 和 6 组则复杂且要求高。有 2 例死亡(分别在术后 5 天和 7 天)可归因于 DS。34 个动脉导管(40%)进行了选择性再次介入治疗。83 例 DS 成功的患者中,53%(n = 44/83)的患者进行了进一步的手术,20 个动脉导管在无症状患者中随时间自然闭合。
动脉导管形态影响技术,并决定动脉导管支架置入术的复杂性、安全性和最终结果。