Suppr超能文献

针对寰枢椎固定的Goel-Harms技术的两种替代技术的生物力学评估:C1侧块-C2双皮质经椎板螺钉固定和C1侧块-C2/3经关节螺钉固定。

Biomechanical evaluation of two alternative techniques to the Goel-Harms technique for atlantoaxial fixation: C1 lateral mass-C2 bicortical translaminar screw fixation and C1 lateral mass-C2/3 transarticular screw fixation.

作者信息

Du Yue-Qi, Li Teng, Ma Chao, Qiao Guang-Yu, Yin Yi-Heng, Yu Xin-Guang

机构信息

1Department of Neurosurgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing; and.

2Key Laboratory of Modern Measurement and Control Technology, Ministry of Education, Beijing Information Science and Technology University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Jan 17;32(5):682-688. doi: 10.3171/2019.11.SPINE191178. Print 2020 May 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors conducted a study to investigate the biomechanical feasibility and stability of C1 lateral mass-C2 bicortical translaminar screw (C1LM-C2TL) fixation, C1 lateral mass-C2/3 transarticular screw (C1LM-C2/3TA) fixation, and C1LM-C2/3TA fixation with transverse cross-links (C1LM-C2/3TACL) as alternative techniques to the Goel-Harms technique (C1 lateral mass-C2 pedicle screw [C1LM-C2PS] fixation) for atlantoaxial fixation.

METHODS

Eight human cadaveric cervical spines (occiput-C7) were tested using an industrial robot. Pure moments that were a maximum of 1.5 Nm were applied in flexion-extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), and axial rotation (AR). The specimens were first tested in the intact state and followed by destabilization (a type II odontoid fracture) and fixation as follows: C1LM-C2PS, C1LM-C2TL, C1LM-C2/3TA, and C1LM-C2/3TACL. For each condition, the authors evaluated the range of motion and neutral zone across C1 and C2 in all directions.

RESULTS

Compared with the intact spine, each instrumented spine significantly increased in stability at the C1-2 segment. C1LM-C2TL fixation demonstrated similar stability in FE and LB and greater stability in AR than C1LM-C2PS fixation. C1LM-C2/3TA fixation was equivalent in LB and superior in FE to those of C1LM-C2PS and C1LM-C2TL fixation. During AR, the C1LM-C2/3TA-instrumented spine failed to maintain segmental stability. After adding a cross-link, the rotational stability was significantly increased in the C1LM-C2/3TACL-instrumented spine compared with the C1LM-C2/3TA-instrumented spine. Although inferior to C1LM-C2TL fixation, the C1LM-C2/3TACL-instrumented spine showed equivalent rotational stability to the C1LM-C2PS-instrumented spine.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of our biomechanical study, C1LM-C2TL and C1LM-C2/3TACL fixation resulted in satisfactory atlantoaxial stabilization compared with C1LM-C2PS. Therefore, the authors believe that the C1LM-C2TL and C1LM-C2/3TACL fixation may serve as alternative procedures when the Goel-Harms technique (C1LM-C2PS) is not feasible due to anatomical constraints.

摘要

目的

作者开展了一项研究,以调查C1侧块-C2双皮质经板螺钉(C1LM-C2TL)固定、C1侧块-C2/3经关节螺钉(C1LM-C2/3TA)固定以及带横向交联的C1LM-C2/3TA固定(C1LM-C2/3TACL)作为寰枢椎固定替代技术(替代Goel-Harms技术,即C1侧块-C2椎弓根螺钉[C1LM-C2PS]固定)的生物力学可行性和稳定性。

方法

使用工业机器人对8具人尸体颈椎(枕骨-C7)进行测试。在屈伸(FE)、侧弯(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)时施加最大为1.5 Nm的纯力矩。标本首先在完整状态下进行测试,然后进行失稳(II型齿突骨折)并按以下方式固定:C1LM-C2PS、C1LM-C2TL、C1LM-C2/3TA和C1LM-C2/3TACL。对于每种情况,作者评估了C1和C2在所有方向上的活动范围和中立区。

结果

与完整脊柱相比,每个植入器械的脊柱在C1-2节段的稳定性均显著增加。C1LM-C2TL固定在FE和LB中表现出与C1LM-C2PS固定相似的稳定性,而在AR中稳定性更高。C1LM-C2/3TA固定在LB中的稳定性与C1LM-C2PS和C1LM-C2TL固定相当,在FE中优于它们。在AR过程中,C1LM-C2/3TA植入器械的脊柱未能维持节段稳定性。添加交联后,与C1LM-C2/3TA植入器械的脊柱相比,C1LM-C2/3TACL植入器械的脊柱的旋转稳定性显著增加。尽管不如C1LM-C2TL固定,但C1LM-C2/3TACL植入器械的脊柱显示出与C1LM-C2PS植入器械的脊柱相当的旋转稳定性。

结论

基于我们的生物力学研究,与C1LM-C2PS相比,C1LM-C2TL和C1LM-C2/3TACL固定导致了令人满意的寰枢椎稳定。因此,作者认为当由于解剖学限制Goel-Harms技术(C1LM-C2PS)不可行时,C1LM-C2TL和C1LM-C2/3TACL固定可作为替代手术方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验