Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, United States; Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States.
Department of Biomechanics, University of Nebraska at Omaha, 6160 University Drive, Omaha, NE 68182, United States.
J Biomech. 2020 Feb 13;100:109600. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2020.109600. Epub 2020 Jan 3.
Measuring postural sway is important for determining functional ability or risk of falling. Gathering postural sway measures outside of controlled environments is desirable for reaching populations with limited mobility. Previous studies have confirmed the accuracy of the magnitude of postural sway using the Nintendo Wii Balance Board (WBB). However, it is unclear if the WBB can accurately measure persistence of postural sway, i.e., the pattern of center-of-pressure fluctuations over time. The purpose of this study was to compare measures of persistence of postural sway (through detrended fluctuation analysis) using WBB and a force platform (FP). Seventeen healthy individuals performed three standing conditions: eyes open, eyes closed, and one-leg standing. The WBB (30 Hz) was placed on top on the FP (600 Hz) to collect data simultaneously, then the FP data were downsampled to 100 Hz and 30 Hz. The agreement between WBB and FP for measures of postural sway were influenced by the sampling rate and postural sway direction. Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent (range: 0.953-0.998) for long-term scaling regions in the anterior-posterior direction, but lower (range: 0.352-0.877) and inconsistent for medial-lateral direction and short-term scaling regions. The three comparison groups (WBB at 30 Hz, FP at 30 Hz, and FP at 100 Hz) showed dissimilar abilities in detecting differences in persistence of postural sway. In summary, the WBB is accurate for quantifying persistence of postural sway measurements in long-term scaling regions in the AP direction, but has limitations for short-term scaling regions and the ML direction.
测量姿势摆动对于确定功能能力或跌倒风险很重要。在非受控环境中收集姿势摆动测量值对于接触活动能力有限的人群是可取的。先前的研究已经证实了使用任天堂 Wii 平衡板(WBB)测量姿势摆动幅度的准确性。然而,目前尚不清楚 WBB 是否可以准确测量姿势摆动的持久性,即压力中心波动随时间的模式。本研究的目的是比较使用 WBB 和力平台(FP)测量的姿势摆动持久性(通过去趋势波动分析)。17 名健康个体进行了三种站立条件:睁眼、闭眼和单腿站立。WBB(30Hz)放置在 FP(600Hz)的顶部以同时收集数据,然后将 FP 数据下采样到 100Hz 和 30Hz。WBB 和 FP 之间的姿势摆动测量值的一致性受到采样率和姿势摆动方向的影响。在前后方向的长期缩放区域中,内类相关系数非常好(范围:0.953-0.998),但在左右方向和短期缩放区域中较低(范围:0.352-0.877)且不一致。三个比较组(30Hz 的 WBB、30Hz 的 FP 和 100Hz 的 FP)在检测姿势摆动持久性差异的能力上表现出不同。总之,WBB 可准确量化 AP 方向长期缩放区域内的姿势摆动持久性测量值,但在短期缩放区域和 ML 方向上存在局限性。