Suppr超能文献

α-防御素侧流试验对髋关节假体周围感染的诊断准确性良好:一项针对52例患者的回顾性队列初步研究。

Good accuracy of the alpha-defensin lateral flow test for hip periprosthetic joint infection: A pilot study in a retrospective cohort of 52 patients.

作者信息

Kuiper Jesse Wp, Pander Pieter, Vos Stan J

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar 1815 JD, Netherlands.

Centre for Orthopedic Research Alkmaar, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar 1815 JD, Netherlands.

出版信息

World J Orthop. 2020 Jan 18;11(1):36-46. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v11.i1.36.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The alpha-defensin lateral flow (ADLF) test is a new diagnostic tool for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Test accuracy for combined cohorts of hip and knee PJI has been reported to be good.

AIM

To assess the accuracy of the ADLF test for hip PJI, and to compare three different diagnostic criteria for PJI.

METHODS

A cohort of 52 patients was identified, with a painful or poorly functioning total hip- or hemi-arthroplasty, that underwent aspiration and a subsequent ADLF test. PJI was diagnosed with Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria, and sensitivity, specificity, overall accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated. Furthermore, test specifics were compared with the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) and 2018 International Consensus Meeting (ICM) criteria for PJI.

RESULTS

Using MSIS criteria, sensitivity was 100% (CI: 54%-100%) and specificity was 89% (CI: 76%-96%). Six true positives and 5 false positives were found, including one case of metallosis. Using EBJIS criteria, more PJIs were found (11 6), sensitivity was lower (71%, CI: 42%-92%) and specificity was higher (97%, CI: 86%-100%), with 4 false negatives and one false positive result. Using 2018 ICM criteria, sensitivity was 91% (62%-100%) and specificity 100% (91%-100%). The results in this cohort are comparable to previous studies.

CONCLUSION

Overall test accuracy of the ADLF test was good in this cohort, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 89%. Using different PJI definition criteria, sensitivity and specificity changed slightly but overall accuracy remained around 90%. Using the ADLF test in metallosis cases can result in false positive results and should be performed with caution.

摘要

背景

α-防御素侧流(ADLF)检测是一种用于人工关节周围感染(PJI)的新型诊断工具。据报道,该检测对髋关节和膝关节PJI联合队列的检测准确性良好。

目的

评估ADLF检测对髋关节PJI的准确性,并比较三种不同的PJI诊断标准。

方法

确定了一组52例患者,这些患者接受了全髋关节置换术或半髋关节置换术,术后出现疼痛或功能不佳,并进行了穿刺抽吸及随后的ADLF检测。采用肌肉骨骼感染学会(MSIS)标准诊断PJI,并计算敏感性、特异性、总体准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。此外,将检测结果与欧洲骨与关节感染学会(EBJIS)和2018年国际共识会议(ICM)的PJI标准进行比较。

结果

采用MSIS标准时,敏感性为100%(可信区间:54%-100%),特异性为89%(可信区间:76%-96%)。发现6例假阳性和5例假阴性,包括1例金属沉着病。采用EBJIS标准时,发现更多的PJI病例(11例对6例),敏感性较低(71%,可信区间:42%-92%),特异性较高(97%,可信区间:86%-100%),有4例假阴性和1例假阳性结果。采用2018年ICM标准时,敏感性为91%(62%-100%),特异性为100%(91%-100%)。该队列的结果与先前的研究相当。

结论

在该队列中,ADLF检测的总体检测准确性良好,敏感性为100%,特异性为89%。使用不同的PJI定义标准时,敏感性和特异性略有变化,但总体准确性仍保持在90%左右。在金属沉着病病例中使用ADLF检测可能会导致假阳性结果,应谨慎进行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2f48/6960303/bd9680edf7d7/WJO-11-36-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验