University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Oncologist. 2020 May;25(5):422-430. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0605. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups are important when considering therapeutic options for first-line treatment.
Adult patients with clear cell mRCC initiating first-line sunitinib between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective database study. Median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were stratified by IMDC risk groups and evaluated for those in the combined intermediate and poor risk group and separately for those in the intermediate risk group with one versus two risk factors.
Among 1,769 patients treated with first-line sunitinib, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate, and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the three risk groups, patients had similar age, gender, and sunitinib initiation year. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 7.1 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 23.2 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS (35.1 vs. 21.9 months) and TTD (10.3 vs. 6.6 months) were significantly different between intermediate risk patients with one versus two risk factors.
This real-world study found a median OS of 52 months for patients with favorable IMDC risk treated with first-line sunitinib, setting a new benchmark on clinical outcomes of clear cell mRCC. Analysis of intermediate risk group by one or two risk factors demonstrated distinct clinical outcomes.
This analysis offers a contemporary benchmark for overall survival (median, 52.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 43.4-61.2) among patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib as first-line therapy in a real-world setting and classified as favorable risk according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group classification. This study demonstrates that clinical outcomes differ between IMDC risk groups as well as within the intermediate risk group based on the number of risk factors, thus warranting further consideration of risk group when counseling patients about therapeutic options and designing clinical trials.
国际转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)数据库联盟(IMDC)风险组在考虑一线治疗的治疗选择时非常重要。
本回顾性数据库研究纳入了 2010 年至 2018 年间接受一线舒尼替尼治疗的透明细胞 mRCC 成年患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计治疗中止时间(TTD)和总生存期(OS)中位数。根据 IMDC 风险组对结果进行分层,并评估联合中危和差危组以及中危组中各有 1 个或 2 个危险因素的患者的情况。
在 1769 例接受一线舒尼替尼治疗的患者中,318 例(18%)为有利风险组,1031 例(58%)为中危风险组,420 例(24%)为差危风险组。在这三个风险组中,患者的年龄、性别和舒尼替尼起始年份相似。有利、中危和差危风险组的 TTD 中位数分别为 15.0、8.5 和 4.2 个月,联合中危和差危风险组为 7.1 个月。有利、中危和差危风险组的 OS 中位数分别为 52.1、31.5 和 9.8 个月,联合中危和差危风险组为 23.2 个月。中间风险患者中,有 1 个和 2 个危险因素的患者的 OS 中位数(35.1 个月 vs. 21.9 个月)和 TTD 中位数(10.3 个月 vs. 6.6 个月)差异具有统计学意义。
这项真实世界研究发现,一线接受舒尼替尼治疗的 IMDC 有利风险患者的中位 OS 为 52 个月,为透明细胞 mRCC 的临床结局树立了新的基准。对中间风险组按一个或两个危险因素进行分析显示出明显不同的临床结局。
本分析为在真实环境中一线接受舒尼替尼治疗的透明细胞转移性肾细胞癌患者的总生存期(中位值,52.1 个月;95%置信区间,43.4-61.2)提供了当代基准,这些患者根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险组分类被归类为有利风险。这项研究表明,IMDC 风险组之间以及中间风险组内,由于危险因素的数量不同,临床结局也不同,因此在为患者提供治疗选择和设计临床试验时,需要进一步考虑风险组。