Suppr超能文献

国际肾细胞癌数据库联盟风险组对一线舒尼替尼治疗的透明细胞转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的临床结局的真实世界评估。

Real-World Assessment of Clinical Outcomes Among First-Line Sunitinib Patients with Clear Cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) by the International mRCC Database Consortium Risk Group.

机构信息

University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

CancerCare Manitoba, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2020 May;25(5):422-430. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0605. Epub 2020 Jan 23.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups are important when considering therapeutic options for first-line treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult patients with clear cell mRCC initiating first-line sunitinib between 2010 and 2018 were included in this retrospective database study. Median time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were stratified by IMDC risk groups and evaluated for those in the combined intermediate and poor risk group and separately for those in the intermediate risk group with one versus two risk factors.

RESULTS

Among 1,769 patients treated with first-line sunitinib, 318 (18%) had favorable, 1,031 (58%) had intermediate, and 420 (24%) had poor IMDC risk. Across the three risk groups, patients had similar age, gender, and sunitinib initiation year. Median TTD was 15.0, 8.5, and 4.2 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 7.1 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS was 52.1, 31.5, and 9.8 months in the favorable, intermediate, and poor risk groups, respectively, and 23.2 months in the combined intermediate and poor risk group. Median OS (35.1 vs. 21.9 months) and TTD (10.3 vs. 6.6 months) were significantly different between intermediate risk patients with one versus two risk factors.

CONCLUSION

This real-world study found a median OS of 52 months for patients with favorable IMDC risk treated with first-line sunitinib, setting a new benchmark on clinical outcomes of clear cell mRCC. Analysis of intermediate risk group by one or two risk factors demonstrated distinct clinical outcomes.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

This analysis offers a contemporary benchmark for overall survival (median, 52.1 months; 95% confidence interval, 43.4-61.2) among patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma who were treated with sunitinib as first-line therapy in a real-world setting and classified as favorable risk according to International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk group classification. This study demonstrates that clinical outcomes differ between IMDC risk groups as well as within the intermediate risk group based on the number of risk factors, thus warranting further consideration of risk group when counseling patients about therapeutic options and designing clinical trials.

摘要

背景

国际转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)数据库联盟(IMDC)风险组在考虑一线治疗的治疗选择时非常重要。

材料与方法

本回顾性数据库研究纳入了 2010 年至 2018 年间接受一线舒尼替尼治疗的透明细胞 mRCC 成年患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 分析估计治疗中止时间(TTD)和总生存期(OS)中位数。根据 IMDC 风险组对结果进行分层,并评估联合中危和差危组以及中危组中各有 1 个或 2 个危险因素的患者的情况。

结果

在 1769 例接受一线舒尼替尼治疗的患者中,318 例(18%)为有利风险组,1031 例(58%)为中危风险组,420 例(24%)为差危风险组。在这三个风险组中,患者的年龄、性别和舒尼替尼起始年份相似。有利、中危和差危风险组的 TTD 中位数分别为 15.0、8.5 和 4.2 个月,联合中危和差危风险组为 7.1 个月。有利、中危和差危风险组的 OS 中位数分别为 52.1、31.5 和 9.8 个月,联合中危和差危风险组为 23.2 个月。中间风险患者中,有 1 个和 2 个危险因素的患者的 OS 中位数(35.1 个月 vs. 21.9 个月)和 TTD 中位数(10.3 个月 vs. 6.6 个月)差异具有统计学意义。

结论

这项真实世界研究发现,一线接受舒尼替尼治疗的 IMDC 有利风险患者的中位 OS 为 52 个月,为透明细胞 mRCC 的临床结局树立了新的基准。对中间风险组按一个或两个危险因素进行分析显示出明显不同的临床结局。

实践意义

本分析为在真实环境中一线接受舒尼替尼治疗的透明细胞转移性肾细胞癌患者的总生存期(中位值,52.1 个月;95%置信区间,43.4-61.2)提供了当代基准,这些患者根据国际转移性肾细胞癌数据库联盟(IMDC)风险组分类被归类为有利风险。这项研究表明,IMDC 风险组之间以及中间风险组内,由于危险因素的数量不同,临床结局也不同,因此在为患者提供治疗选择和设计临床试验时,需要进一步考虑风险组。

相似文献

3
Is It Possible to Improve Prognostic Classification in Patients Affected by Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma With an Intermediate or Poor Prognosis?
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018 Oct;16(5):355-359.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.04.007. Epub 2018 May 7.
5
Real-world Experience With Sunitinib Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Clinical Outcome According to Risk Score.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020 Oct;18(5):e588-e597. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2020.02.013. Epub 2020 Mar 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Avelumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1103-1115. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816047. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
2
Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 21;380(12):1116-1127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714. Epub 2019 Feb 16.
4
The Current and Evolving Landscape of First-Line Treatments for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.
Oncologist. 2019 Mar;24(3):338-348. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0267. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
5
Ipilimumab in combination with nivolumab for the treatment of renal cell carcinoma.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Sep;18(9):947-957. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1513485. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
7
Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma.
N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 5;378(14):1277-1290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1712126. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
9
Immune checkpoint inhibitors in challenging populations.
Cancer. 2017 Jun 1;123(11):1904-1911. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30642. Epub 2017 Feb 27.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验