Department of Psychology, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ, USA.
New Jersey Institute for Successful Aging, School of Osteopathic Medicine, Rowan University, Stratford, NJ, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2020 Apr;42(3):319-328. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2020.1714550. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
The Oblique Effect denotes superior performance for perceiving horizontal or vertical rather than diagonal or oblique stimuli. The current research investigated responding to oblique test stimuli in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI).: Four statistically-determined groups (n = 112) were studied; patients with little to no cognitive impairment (non-MCI, n = 39); subtle cognitive impairment (SCI, n = 15); amnestic MCI (aMCI, n = 28); and a combined mixed/dysexecutive MCI (mixed/dys MCI, n = 30). The ability to respond to oblique versus non-oblique test stimuli was assessed using the Judgment of Line Orientation Test (JOLO). Comprehensive neuropsychological assessment was also obtained. Between-group differences for JOLO oblique and non-oblique test stimuli were analyzed. Hierarchical linear regression models were constructed to identify relations between accuracy for oblique and non-oblique test items and neurocognitive domains.: The mixed/dys MCI group demonstrated lower accuracy for oblique test items compared to non-MCI patients. Accurate responding to oblique test items was associated with better performance on tests measuring executive control, processing speed, naming/lexical retrieval, and verbal concept formation. No between-group differences were seen for non-oblique items and these items were not associated with cognition.Significant impairment on oblique test items distinguished patients with multi-domain/dysexecutive MCI from non-MCI patients. Accurate responding to oblique test items was associated with a complex array of neuropsychological tests suggesting that multidimensional neuropsychological skills underlie the visuospatial reasoning abilities necessary for successful oblique line identification. Research associating responding to oblique versus non-oblique test stimuli using additional neuropsychological test paradigms, and MRI-defined neuroanatomical regions of interest may provide additional information about the brain-behavior relations that underlie MCI subtypes.
斜向效应表示,在感知水平或垂直刺激时,表现优于感知对角或斜向刺激。本研究调查了轻度认知障碍(MCI)患者对斜向测试刺激的反应。研究了四个统计学确定的组(n=112);认知障碍较小或没有(非 MCI,n=39);轻微认知障碍(SCI,n=15);遗忘型 MCI(aMCI,n=28);以及混合/执行功能障碍 MCI(混合/执行功能障碍 MCI,n=30)。使用线判断倾斜度测试(JOLO)评估对斜向与非斜向测试刺激的反应能力。还进行了全面的神经心理学评估。分析了 JOLO 斜向和非斜向测试刺激的组间差异。构建了层次线性回归模型,以确定斜向和非斜向测试项目的准确性与神经认知域之间的关系。混合/执行功能障碍 MCI 组对斜向测试项目的准确性低于非 MCI 患者。准确回答斜向测试项目与执行控制、加工速度、命名/词汇检索和言语概念形成测试的表现更好相关。非斜向项目之间没有组间差异,这些项目与认知无关。斜向测试项目的显著损伤将多领域/执行功能障碍 MCI 患者与非 MCI 患者区分开来。准确回答斜向测试项目与一系列复杂的神经心理学测试相关,这表明多维神经心理学技能是成功识别斜向线所需的空间推理能力的基础。使用其他神经心理学测试范式和 MRI 定义的神经解剖学感兴趣区域来关联斜向与非斜向测试刺激的反应,可能会提供有关认知障碍亚型的大脑行为关系的更多信息。