Nieboer Marilin J, Meesters Arne A, Almasian Mitra, Georgiou Giota, de Rie Menno A, Verdaasdonk Rudolf M, Wolkerstorfer Albert
Netherlands Institute for Pigment Disorders, Department of Dermatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105, Amsterdam, AZ, Netherlands.
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Aug;35(6):1357-1365. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-02950-2. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
Different devices have been used to enhance topical drug delivery. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of different skin pretreatment regimens in topical drug delivery. In six ex vivo human abdominal skin samples, test regions were pretreated with fractional CO and Er:YAG laser (both 70 and 300 μm ablation depth, density of 5%), microneedling (500 μm needle length), fractional radiofrequency (ablation depth of ± 80-90 μm), and no pretreatment. The fluorescent agent indocyanine green (ICG) was applied. After 3 h, fluorescence intensity was measured at several depths using fluorescence photography. Significantly higher surface fluorescence intensities were found for pretreatment with fractional Er:YAG and CO laser and for microneedling vs. no pretreatment (p < 0.05), but not for radiofrequency vs. no pretreatment (p = 0.173). Fluorescence intensity was highest for the Er:YAG laser with 300 μm ablation depth (mean 38.89 arbitrary units; AU), followed by microneedling (33.02 AU) and CO laser with 300 μm ablation depth (26.25 AU). Pretreatment with both lasers with 300 μm ablation depth gave higher fluorescence intensity than with 70 μm ablation depth (Er:YAG laser, 21.65; CO laser, 18.50 AU). Mean fluorescence intensity for radiofrequency was 15.27 AU. Results were comparable at 200 and 400 μm depth in the skin. Pretreatment of the skin with fractional CO laser, fractional Er:YAG laser, and microneedling is effective for topical ICG delivery, while fractional radiofrequency is not. Deeper laser ablation results in improved ICG delivery. These findings may be relevant for the delivery of other drugs with comparable molecular properties.
已使用不同的设备来增强局部药物递送。本研究的目的是比较不同皮肤预处理方案在局部药物递送中的疗效。在六个离体人腹部皮肤样本中,测试区域分别用剥脱性二氧化碳激光和铒钇铝石榴石激光(消融深度均为70和300μm,密度为5%)、微针(针长500μm)、剥脱性射频(消融深度为±80 - 90μm)进行预处理,以及不进行预处理。应用荧光剂吲哚菁绿(ICG)。3小时后,使用荧光摄影在几个深度测量荧光强度。与未预处理相比,发现剥脱性铒钇铝石榴石激光和二氧化碳激光预处理以及微针预处理后的表面荧光强度显著更高(p < 0.05),但射频预处理与未预处理相比则不然(p = 0.173)。消融深度为300μm的铒钇铝石榴石激光的荧光强度最高(平均38.89任意单位;AU),其次是微针(33.02 AU)和消融深度为300μm的二氧化碳激光(26.25 AU)。消融深度为300μm的两种激光预处理产生的荧光强度高于消融深度为70μm的情况(铒钇铝石榴石激光为21.65;二氧化碳激光为18.50 AU)。射频的平均荧光强度为15.27 AU。在皮肤200和400μm深度处结果具有可比性。用剥脱性二氧化碳激光、剥脱性铒钇铝石榴石激光和微针预处理皮肤对于局部ICG递送是有效的,而剥脱性射频则无效。更深的激光消融可改善ICG递送。这些发现可能与递送具有类似分子特性的其他药物相关。