Suppr超能文献

申请人的性别对医学生急诊医学轮转期间获得的标准化评价信有影响吗?

Does Applicant Gender Have an Effect on Standardized Letters of Evaluation Obtained During Medical Student Emergency Medicine Rotations?

作者信息

Andrusaitis Jessica, Clark Clelia, Saadat Soheil, Billimek John, Paradise Sara, Wray Alisa, Wiechmann Warren, Toohey Shannon, Boysen-Osborn Megan

机构信息

Irvine CA.

Department of Emergency Medicine University of California Irvine Orange CA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2019 Dec 6;4(1):18-23. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10394. eCollection 2020 Jan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE) in emergency medicine (EM) is one of the most important items in a student's application to EM residency and replaces narrative letters of recommendation. The SLOE ranks students into quantile categories in comparison to their peers for overall performance during an EM clerkship and for their expected rank list position. Gender differences exist in several assessment methods in undergraduate and graduate medical education. No authors have recently studied whether there are differences in the global assessment of men and women on the SLOE.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine if there is an effect of student gender on the outcome of a SLOE.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study examining SLOEs from applications to a large urban, academic EM residency program from 2015 to 2016. Composite scores (CSs), comparative rank scores (CRSs), and rank list position scores (RLPSs) on the SLOE were compared for female and male applicants using Mann-Whitney U-test.

RESULTS

From a total 1,408 applications, 1,038 applicants met inclusion criteria (74%). We analyzed 2,092 SLOEs from these applications. Female applicants were found to have slightly lower and thus better CRSs, RLPSs, and CSs than men. The mean CRS for women was 2.27 and 2.45 for men (p < 0.001); RLPS for women was 2.32 and 2.52 for men (p < 0.001) and CS was 4.59 for women and 4.97 for men (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Female applicants have somewhat better performance on the EM SLOE than their male counterparts.

摘要

背景

急诊医学(EM)标准化评估信(SLOE)是学生申请EM住院医师培训最重要的材料之一,取代了推荐信。SLOE将学生在EM实习期间的整体表现与其同龄人进行比较,并将他们划分到不同的分位数类别中,同时还包括他们预期的排名位置。在本科和研究生医学教育的几种评估方法中存在性别差异。最近没有作者研究过在SLOE的整体评估中男性和女性是否存在差异。

目的

本研究的目的是确定学生性别是否对SLOE的结果有影响。

方法

这是一项回顾性观察研究,研究对象为2015年至2016年申请进入一个大型城市学术性EM住院医师培训项目的SLOE。使用Mann-Whitney U检验比较了女性和男性申请人在SLOE上的综合得分(CSs)、比较排名得分(CRSs)和排名列表位置得分(RLPSs)。

结果

在总共1408份申请中,1038名申请人符合纳入标准(74%)。我们分析了这些申请中的2092份SLOE。发现女性申请人的CRSs、RLPSs和CSs略低于男性,因此表现更好。女性的平均CRS为2.27,男性为2.45(p < 0.001);女性的RLPS为2.32,男性为2.52(p < 0.001),CS女性为4.59,男性为4.97(p < 0.001)。

结论

女性申请人在EM SLOE上的表现略优于男性申请人。

相似文献

4
Gender differences in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信中的性别差异。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10740. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10740. eCollection 2022 Apr.

引用本文的文献

2
To the Editor: Addressing Limitations of a Standardized Letter of Recommendation.致编辑:论标准化推荐信的局限性
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Apr;15(2):266-267. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-23-00149.1. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Gender differences in emergency medicine standardized letters of evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信中的性别差异。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Apr 1;6(2):e10740. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10740. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
Validity Evidence for the Emergency Medicine Standardized Letter of Evaluation.急诊医学标准化评估信的有效性证据。
J Grad Med Educ. 2021 Aug;13(4):490-499. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-20-01110.1. Epub 2021 Aug 13.

本文引用的文献

4
Emergency Medicine Residency Selection Criteria: An Update and Comparison.急诊医学住院医师选拔标准:更新与比较
AEM Educ Train. 2018 Mar 22;2(2):146-153. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10089. eCollection 2018 Apr.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验