Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York (S.S., B.E.C., R.C., P.G., B.V., U.B., Y.L., R. Mehran).
Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA (V.R., J.W.).
Circulation. 2020 Mar 17;141(11):891-901. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.041619. Epub 2020 Jan 29.
Long-term outcomes in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate long-term adverse events in HBR patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation.
We analyzed stratified data from 4 all-comers postapproval registries. Patients with at least 1 of the following criteria were categorized as HBR: age ≥75 years, history of major bleeding (MB), history of stroke, chronic oral anticoagulant use, chronic kidney disease, anemia, or thrombocytopenia. Additionally, in a separate analysis, patients were categorized according to the recently published Academic Research Consortium HBR criteria. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analyses. Coronary thrombotic events (CTE) included myocardial infarction or definite/probable stent thrombosis. MB was defined according to the TIMI (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction) or GUSTO (Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded Coronary Arteries) scales. Impact of CTE and MB on subsequent risk of mortality was assessed using multivariable Cox regression with MB and CTE included as time-updated covariates.
Of the total 10 502 patients included, 3507 (33%) were identified as HBR. Compared with non-HBR patients, those at HBR had more comorbidities, higher lesion complexity, and a higher risk of 4-year mortality (Hazard Ratio [HR] 4.38 [95% CI, 3.76-5.11]). Results were qualitatively similar when using Academic Research Consortium criteria to define HBR. Risk of mortality was increased after CTE (HR 5.02 [95% CI, 3.93-6.41]), as well as after MB (HR 4.92 [95% CI, 3.82-6.35]). Of note, this effect was consistent across the spectrum of bleeding risk (-interaction test 0.97 and 0.06, respectively).
Compared with the non-HBR population, HBR patients experienced worse 4-year outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention with cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stent. Both CTE and MB had a significant impact on subsequent risk of mortality irrespective of bleeding risk.
在接受药物洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的高出血风险(HBR)患者中,长期结局尚不清楚。因此,我们旨在评估钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架植入经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 HBR 患者的长期不良事件。
我们分析了 4 项全人群上市后注册研究的分层数据。至少有以下 1 项标准的患者被归类为 HBR:年龄≥75 岁、有大出血(MB)史、有卒中史、长期口服抗凝药、慢性肾脏病、贫血或血小板减少症。此外,在单独的分析中,患者根据最近发布的学术研究联盟(ARC)HBR 标准进行分类。Kaplan-Meier 方法用于进行生存时间分析。冠状动脉血栓事件(CTE)包括心肌梗死或确定/可能的支架血栓形成。MB 根据 TIMI(心肌梗死溶栓)或 GUSTO(全球经皮冠状动脉介入开通闭塞冠状动脉的策略)量表定义。使用多变量 Cox 回归评估 CTE 和 MB 对随后死亡率风险的影响,其中将 MB 和 CTE 作为时间更新的协变量纳入。
在纳入的 10502 例患者中,有 3507 例(33%)被确定为 HBR。与非 HBR 患者相比,HBR 患者合并症更多,病变更复杂,4 年死亡率更高(危险比 [HR] 4.38 [95%CI,3.76-5.11])。使用 ARC 标准定义 HBR 时,结果具有相似的定性特征。CTE 后(HR 5.02 [95%CI,3.93-6.41])和 MB 后(HR 4.92 [95%CI,3.82-6.35]),死亡率风险均增加。值得注意的是,这种影响在整个出血风险范围内是一致的(-交互检验分别为 0.97 和 0.06)。
与非 HBR 人群相比,在接受钴铬依维莫司洗脱支架经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的 HBR 患者中,4 年后结局更差。CTE 和 MB 对死亡率的后续风险都有显著影响,与出血风险无关。