Am Nat. 2020 Feb;195(2):201-215. doi: 10.1086/706475. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
Group living can be beneficial when individuals reproduce or survive better in the presence of others, but, simultaneously, there might be costs due to competition for resources. Positive and negative effects on various fitness components might thus counteract each other, so integration is essential to determine their overall effect. Here, we investigated how an integrated fitness measure (reproductive values [RVs]) based on six fitness components varied with group size among group members in cooperatively breeding red-winged and superb fairy wrens ( and , respectively). Despite life-history differences between the species, patterns of RVs were similar, suggesting that the same behavioral mechanisms are important. Group living reduced RVs for dominant males, but for other group members, this was true only in large groups. Decomposition analyses showed that our integrated fitness proxy was most strongly affected by group size effects on survival and was amplified through carryover effects between years. Our study shows that integrative consideration of fitness components and subsequent decomposition analysis provide much needed insights into the key behavioral mechanisms shaping the costs and benefits of group living. Such attribution is crucial if we are to synthesize the relative importance of the myriad group size costs and benefits currently reported in the literature.
当个体在他人的存在下繁殖或生存得更好时,群体生活可能是有益的,但同时,由于资源竞争,也可能会产生成本。因此,对各种适应度成分的积极和消极影响可能会相互抵消,因此整合对于确定它们的整体效果至关重要。在这里,我们研究了在合作繁殖的红翅和超级仙鹟( 和 ,分别)中,基于六个适应度成分的综合适应度衡量标准(生殖值[RVs])如何随群体大小而变化。尽管这两个物种的生活史存在差异,但 RVs 的模式相似,这表明相同的行为机制很重要。群体生活降低了优势雄性的 RVs,但对于其他群体成员来说,这种情况仅在大群体中才成立。分解分析表明,我们的综合适应度指标主要受到群体大小对存活率的影响,并且通过年际间的延续效应得到放大。我们的研究表明,对适应度成分的综合考虑以及随后的分解分析为塑造群体生活成本和收益的关键行为机制提供了急需的见解。如果我们要综合当前文献中报告的无数群体大小成本和收益的相对重要性,那么这种归因至关重要。