Suppr超能文献

基于16SrDNA测序技术分析重症肺炎肠道患者的菌群变化

[Analysis of intestinal patients' flora changes with severe pneumonia based on 16SrDNA sequencing technology].

作者信息

Zhang Xiaoya, Yang Xiaojuan, Zhang Zhenqi, Lei Mengmeng, Zhang Xiaobin, Wang Xiaohong, Yang Xiaojun

机构信息

Department of Intensive Care Unit, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China.

China University of Mining and Technology Yinchuan College, Yinchuan 750011, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 Dec;31(12):1479-1484. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.12.009.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the characteristics of gut microbiota dysbosis in patients with severe pneumonia using 16SrDNA sequencing.

METHODS

A prospective observational research was conducted. The stool samples retained by natural defecation or enema within 2 days after hospital were collected from 16 patients with severe pneumonia admitted to department of intensive care unit (ICU) of General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University from June to December in 2018 and 10 persons for physical exam were enrolled as the healthy control group. The 16SrDNA sequencing technology was used to detect fecal flora and analyze biological information.

RESULTS

(1) 1 015 475 effective sequences were obtained from the stool samples from the severe pneumonia group and the healthy control group. Using 16SrDNA method, it was found that the average effective length of the sample sequence was 458.35 bp and the average sequence number of the total samples was 39 056.73. (2) Analysis of α diversity of gut microbiota showed that, compared with the healthy control group, the Ace index, Chao index and the Shannon index of gut microbiota diversity in the severe pneumonia group were significantly decreased [Ace index: 167.23 (143.14, 211.26) vs. 227.71 (214.53, 247.05), Chao index: 152.38 (138.09, 182.54) vs. 228.25 (215.49, 248.95), Shannon index: 2.37 (1.68, 2.89) vs. 3.39 (3.03, 3.63), all P < 0.01], and the Simpson index was significantly increased [0.21 (0.11, 0.33) vs. 0.07 (0.06, 0.12), P < 0.01], which indicated the gut microbiota diversity of the severe pneumonia group was decreased. (3) Analysis of β diversity of gut microbiota, principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) showed that gut microbiota structural with the healthy control group was similar, while that in the severe pneumonia group was different. Adonis analysis showed that the structural of the gut microflora revealing significant differences between the severe pneumonia group and the healthy control group (R = 0.061, P = 0.05). (4) Analysis of phylum difference gut microflora showed that, compared with the healthy control group, the proportion of Firmicutes in severe pneumonia group was decreased [27.36 (18.12, 39.28)% vs. 52.25 (38.36, 63.82)%, P = 0.02], the proportions of Actinobacterias, Synergistetes and Fusobacterias were increased [2.30 (0.30, 4.80)% vs. 0.02 (0.00, 0.06)%, 0.36 (< 0.01, 0.57)% vs. < 0.01 (< 0.01, < 0.01)%, 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.08)% vs. < 0.01 (< 0.01, < 0.01)%, all P < 0.05]. (5) Analysis of genus difference gut microflora showed that, the proportions of Bifidobacterium, Ruminococcus, Pseudobutyrivibrio, Coprococcus, Lachnospira and Prevotella in the severe pneumonia group were significantly lower than those in healthy control group [0.18 (0.01, 0.25)% vs. 3.40 (0.46, 5.78)%, 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.29)% vs. 2.26 (0.84, 4.86)%, 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.02)% vs. 2.73 (1.87, 5.74)%, 0.02 (< 0.01, 0.07)% vs. 0.80 (0.50, 2.32)%, < 0.01 (< 0.01, < 0.01)% vs. 0.88 (0.33, 2.08)%, 0.02 (< 0.01, 0.31)% vs. 7.74 (0.07, 36.27)%, all P < 0.05]; the proportions of Escherichia and Enterococcus in the severe pneumonia group were higher than those in healthy control group, but there was no difference between the two groups [2.00 (0.57, 10.23)% vs. 1.16 (0.23, 2.68)%, 0.02 (< 0.01, 0.42)% vs. < 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.04)%, both P > 0.05]; the proportions of Fusobacterium and Staphylococcus in severe pneumonia group were significantly higher than those in healthy control group [0.01 (< 0.01, 0.08)% vs. < 0.01 (< 0.01, < 0.01)%, 0.01 (< 0.01, 0.02)% vs. < 0.01 (< 0.01, < 0.01)%, both P < 0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

Gut microbiota dysbiosis in patients with severe pneumonia shows that the abundance and diversity decrease, structure of intestinal flora changes, and beneficial symbiotic bacteria decrease and pathogenic bacteria increase, which may be associated with the occurrence and development of severe pneumonia.

摘要

目的

采用16SrDNA测序技术研究重症肺炎患者肠道微生物群失调的特征。

方法

进行一项前瞻性观察性研究。收集2018年6月至12月在宁夏医科大学总医院重症监护病房(ICU)住院的16例重症肺炎患者在入院后2天内自然排便或灌肠留存的粪便样本,并选取10例体检者作为健康对照组。采用16SrDNA测序技术检测粪便菌群并分析生物学信息。

结果

(1)从重症肺炎组和健康对照组的粪便样本中获得1 015 475条有效序列。采用16SrDNA方法发现,样本序列的平均有效长度为458.35 bp,总样本的平均序列数为39 056.73。(2)肠道微生物群α多样性分析显示,与健康对照组相比,重症肺炎组肠道微生物群多样性的Ace指数、Chao指数和Shannon指数显著降低[Ace指数:167.23(143.14,211.26)对227.71(214.53,247.05),Chao指数:152.38(138.09,182.54)对228.25(215.49,248.95),Shannon指数:2.37(1.68,2.89)对3.39(3.03,3.63),均P<0.01],而Simpson指数显著升高[0.21(0.11,0.33)对0.07(0.06,0.12),P<0.01],这表明重症肺炎组肠道微生物群多样性降低。(3)肠道微生物群β多样性分析,主坐标分析(PCoA)显示,重症肺炎组肠道微生物群结构与健康对照组相似,而重症肺炎组不同。Adonis分析显示,重症肺炎组与健康对照组肠道微生物群结构存在显著差异(R = 0.061,P = 0.05)。(4)肠道微生物群门差异分析显示,与健康对照组相比,重症肺炎组厚壁菌门比例降低[27.36(18.12,39.28)%对52.25(38.36,63.82)%,P = 0.02],放线菌门、协同菌门和梭杆菌门比例升高[2.30(0.30,4.80)%对0.02(0.00,0.06)%,0.36(<0.01,0.57)%对<0.01(<0.01,<0.01)%,0.01(<0.01,0.08)%对<0.01(<0.01,<0.01)%,均P<0.05]。(5)肠道微生物群属差异分析显示,重症肺炎组双歧杆菌属、瘤胃球菌属、假丁酸弧菌属、粪球菌属、毛螺菌属和普雷沃菌属的比例显著低于健康对照组[0.18(0.01,0.25)%对3.40(0.46,5.78)%,0.01(<0.01,

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验