Suppr超能文献

CO9.3μm 短脉冲激光照射在有和没有氟化物应用的情况下减少釉质侵蚀的效果:一项随机、对照的体外研究。

The effect of CO 9.3 μm short-pulsed laser irradiation in enamel erosion reduction with and without fluoride applications-a randomized, controlled in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Av Prof. Lineu Prestes, 2227 - Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, SP, 05508-000, Brazil.

Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California at San Francisco, 707 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

出版信息

Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Jul;35(5):1213-1222. doi: 10.1007/s10103-020-02979-3. Epub 2020 Feb 7.

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the protective effect of short-pulsed CO 9.3 μm laser irradiation against erosion in human enamel without and combined with TiF and AmF/NaF/SnCl applications, respectively, as well as compared to the protective effect of these fluoride treatments alone. After polishing, ninety enamel samples (3 × 3mm) were used for 9 different treatment groups: 4% TiF gel (pH 1.5, 24,533 ppm F); AmF/NaF/SnCl rinse (pH 4.5; 500 ppm F, 800 ppm Sn); CO laser (average power 0.58 W); CO laser (0.58 W) + TiF; CO laser (0.58 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl; CO laser (0.69 W); CO laser (0.69 W) + TiF; CO laser (0.69 W) + AmF/NaF/SnCl; negative control (deionized water). TiF gel was brushed on only once before the first erosive cycling, while samples treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl were daily immersed in 5 ml of the solution before cycling. Laser treatment occurred with a CO laser (wavelength 9.3 μm, pulse repetition rate 100 Hz, pulse duration 14.6 μs/18 μs, average power 0.58 W/0.69 W, fluence 1.9 J/cm/2.2 J/cm, beam diameter 0.63 mm, irradiation time 10 s, air cooling). TiF was applied only once, while AmF/NaF/SnCl was applied once daily before the erosive challenge. Surface loss (in μm) was measured with optical profilometry immediately after treatment, and after 5 and 10 days of erosive cycling (0.5% citric acid, pH 2.3, 6 × 2 min/day). Additionally, scanning electron microscopy investigations were performed. All application measures resulted in loss of surface height immediately after treatment. After 5 days, significantly reduced surface loss was observed after applying laser irradiation (both power settings) followed by applications of TiF or AmF/NaF/SnCl solution (p < 0.05; 2-way ANOVA and Tukey test) compared to fluoride application alone. After 10 days, compared to after 5 days, a reduced tissue loss was observed in all groups treated with AmF/NaF/SnCl solution. This tissue gain occurred with the AmF/NaF/SnCl application alone and was significantly higher when the application was combined with the laser use (p < 0.05). Short-pulsed CO 9.3 μm laser irradiation followed by additional application of AmF/NaF/SnCl solution significantly reduces the progression of dental enamel erosion in vitro.

摘要

本体外研究旨在评估短脉冲 CO 9.3 μm 激光照射对人牙釉质侵蚀的保护作用,分别评估其在无氟、TiF 和 AmF/NaF/SnCl 应用以及与这些氟化物单独处理的保护作用。在抛光后,使用 90 个牙釉质样本(3×3mm)进行 9 种不同的处理组:4% TiF 凝胶(pH 1.5,24533ppm F);AmF/NaF/SnCl 漱口水(pH 4.5;500ppm F,800ppm Sn);CO 激光(平均功率 0.58W);CO 激光(0.58W)+TiF;CO 激光(0.58W)+AmF/NaF/SnCl;CO 激光(0.69W);CO 激光(0.69W)+TiF;CO 激光(0.69W)+AmF/NaF/SnCl;阴性对照(去离子水)。TiF 凝胶仅在第一次侵蚀循环前刷一次,而用 AmF/NaF/SnCl 处理的样本在循环前每天浸泡在 5ml 溶液中。激光处理使用 CO 激光(波长 9.3μm,脉冲重复率 100Hz,脉冲持续时间 14.6μs/18μs,平均功率 0.58W/0.69W,通量 1.9J/cm/2.2J/cm,光束直径 0.63mm,辐照时间 10s,空气冷却)。TiF 仅应用一次,而 AmF/NaF/SnCl 在侵蚀挑战前每天应用一次。处理后立即用光学轮廓仪测量表面损失(以 μm 为单位),并在侵蚀循环后 5 天和 10 天(0.5%柠檬酸,pH 2.3,每天 6×2 分钟)进行测量。此外,还进行了扫描电子显微镜研究。所有应用措施都会导致治疗后立即失去表面高度。5 天后,与单独应用氟化物相比,观察到应用激光照射(两种功率设置)后紧接着应用 TiF 或 AmF/NaF/SnCl 溶液会显著降低表面损失(p<0.05;2 因素方差分析和 Tukey 检验)。10 天后,与 5 天后相比,所有用 AmF/NaF/SnCl 溶液处理的组均观察到组织损失减少。这种组织增益仅在单独应用 AmF/NaF/SnCl 时发生,当与激光联合使用时,其效果显著更高(p<0.05)。短脉冲 CO 9.3 μm 激光照射后再应用 AmF/NaF/SnCl 溶液可显著减少体外牙釉质侵蚀的进展。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验