Suppr超能文献

老年人下颈椎损伤与治疗相关死亡率——前路或后路。

Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury in the Elderly and Treatment-Related Mortality - Anterior or Posterior Approach.

机构信息

Department for Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Cologne University Hospital.

Department for Spinal Surgery, Dusseldorf Schoen Hospital.

出版信息

Z Orthop Unfall. 2021 Jun;159(3):266-273. doi: 10.1055/a-1101-9884. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Subaxial cervical spine injury especially in the elderly can be associated to severe complications and disability. Until today there is no consensus concerning the best operative treatment. A potential superiority of anterior or posterior fixation is the subject of controversial discussions.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of anterior and posterior fixation after subaxial cervical spine trauma in the elderly focussing on the postoperative mortality.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis was performed to analyse the data of 43 patients. Especially mortality data were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 43 patients was identified. Anterior fixation was performed in 21 patients, posterior fixation was performed in 22 patients. There were no significant differences between these groups. Although statistical significance was not reached, a slightly higher mortality was found among patients undergoing anterior fixation (52,4 vs. 31,8%). Furthermore the male sex, a higher age, translation injuries, long duration of operation and hospitalisation as well as postoperative complications were slightly associated to a higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Subaxial cervical spine trauma is associated to a high mortality in the elderly. Although neither anterior nor posterior fixation could show a significant superiority, every surgical decision making should be performed individually for each patient balancing the advantages and disadvantages of each method.

摘要

背景

下颈椎损伤,尤其是老年人,可能会导致严重的并发症和残疾。到目前为止,对于最佳手术治疗方法还没有共识。前路或后路固定术的潜在优势是有争议的话题。

目的

本研究旨在比较老年人下颈椎创伤后前路和后路固定的治疗效果,重点关注术后死亡率。

材料与方法

回顾性队列分析,分析了 43 例患者的数据。特别收集了死亡率数据。

结果

共确定了 43 例患者。其中 21 例行前路固定,22 例行后路固定。两组间无显著差异。尽管未达到统计学意义,但前路固定组的死亡率略高(52.4%比 31.8%)。此外,男性、年龄较大、平移损伤、手术和住院时间较长以及术后并发症与死亡率升高略相关。

结论

老年人下颈椎创伤死亡率较高。虽然前路和后路固定都没有显示出明显的优势,但应根据每个患者的情况,权衡每种方法的优缺点,单独为每位患者做出手术决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验