Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton.
National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Facility, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton.
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Feb 27;70(692):e172-e178. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X708209. Print 2020 Mar.
Consultations for self-limiting infections in children are increasing. It has been proposed that digital technology could be used to enable parents' decision making in terms of self-care and treatment seeking.
To evaluate the evidence that digital interventions facilitate parents deciding whether to self-care or seek treatment for acute illnesses in children.
Systematic review of studies undertaken worldwide.
Searches of MEDLINE and EMBASE were made to identify studies (of any design) published between database inception and January 2019 that assessed digital interventions for parents of children (from any healthcare setting) with acute illnesses. The primary outcome of interest was whether the use of digital interventions reduced the use of urgent care services.
Three studies were included in the review. They assessed two apps and one website: Children's On-Call - a US advice-only app; Should I See a Doctor? - a Dutch self-triage app for any acute illness; and Strategy for Off-Site Rapid Triage (SORT) for Kids - a US self-triage website for influenza-like illness. None of the studies involved parents during intervention development and it was shown that many parents did not find the two apps easy to use. The sensitivity of self-triage interventions was 84% for Should I See a Doctor? compared with nurse triage, and 93.3% for SORT for Kids compared with the need for emergency-department intervention; however, both had lower specificity (74% and 13%, respectively). None of the interventions demonstrated reduced use of urgent-care services.
There is little evidence to support the use of digital interventions to help parent and/or carers looking after children with acute illness. Future research should involve parents during intervention development, and adequately powered trials are needed to assess the impact of such interventions on health services and the identification of children who are seriously ill.
儿童自限性感染的咨询量正在增加。有人提出,数字技术可以用于帮助父母做出自我护理和寻求治疗的决策。
评估数字干预措施是否有助于父母决定是否自行护理或寻求治疗儿童急性疾病。
在全球范围内进行的系统评价研究。
对 MEDLINE 和 EMBASE 进行检索,以确定自数据库建立以来至 2019 年 1 月期间发表的评估针对儿童(来自任何医疗保健环境)的急性疾病的父母的数字干预措施的研究(任何设计)。主要关注的结果是数字干预措施是否减少了紧急护理服务的使用。
本综述纳入了三项研究。它们评估了两个应用程序和一个网站:儿童急救热线(美国仅提供建议的应用程序);我应该去看医生吗?(荷兰用于任何急性疾病的自我分诊应用程序);和 Strategy for Off-Site Rapid Triage (SORT) for Kids(美国用于流感样疾病的自我分诊网站)。这些研究都没有在干预措施开发过程中涉及父母,并且表明许多父母认为这两个应用程序使用起来并不容易。自我分诊干预措施的敏感性为 84%,用于 Should I See a Doctor?与护士分诊相比,SORT for Kids 为 93.3%,与急诊干预的需求相比;然而,特异性都较低(分别为 74%和 13%)。这些干预措施都没有显示出减少对紧急护理服务的使用。
几乎没有证据支持使用数字干预措施来帮助照顾患有急性疾病的儿童的父母和/或照顾者。未来的研究应在干预措施开发过程中涉及父母,并需要进行充分的效能试验,以评估这些干预措施对卫生服务和识别严重疾病儿童的影响。