Godzik Jakub, Dalton Jonathan, Hemphill Courtney, Walker Corey, Chapple Kristina, Cook Alan, Uribe Juan S, Turner Jay D
Department of Neurosurgery, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.
Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;5(4):466-474. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.09.26.
Conflicting reports exist regarding mortality and morbidity of early surgical decompression in the setting of acute central cord syndrome (ACS) in multisystem trauma despite evidence of improved neurological outcomes. Consequently, optimal decompression timing in ACS in multisystem trauma patients remains controversial. This study aims to determine the association between early surgery for acute traumatic central cord and all-cause mortality among multisystem trauma patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) using propensity score matching.
We used the NTDB (years 2011-2014) to perform a retrospective cohort study, which included patients >18 years, with ACS (identified using ICD-9 coding). Collected patient data included demographics, surgery timing (≤24 hours, >24 hours), injury mechanism, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), injury severity score (ISS), serious adverse events (SAE). Logistic regression and propensity matching were used to investigate the relationship between surgery timing and subsequent inpatient mortality.
We identified 2,379 traumatic ACS patients. This group was 79.3% male with an average age of 56.3±15.2. They had an average ISS of 19.5±9.0 and mortality rate of 3.0% (n=72). A total of 731 (30.7%) patients underwent surgery for ACS within 24 hours. Univariate analysis did not show a significantly higher mortality rate in the early versus late surgery groups (3.8% 2.7%, P=0.127). In unadjusted models, early surgery was not predictive of death or SAE + death in full (P=0.129, P=0.140) or matched samples (P=0.137, P=0.280). In models adjusted for age, ISS, and CCI, early surgery was predictive of death and SAE + death using the full sample (P=0.013, P=0.027), but not when using the propensity matched sample (P=0.107, P=0.255).
Early surgical intervention does not appear to be associated with increased mortality among ACS patients unlike previously suggested. We theorize that survival noted within the NTDB is confounded by factors including existing comorbidities and multisystem trauma, rather than surgical timing. Delaying definitive surgical care may predispose patients to worsened greater neurological morbidity.
尽管有证据表明早期手术减压可改善急性中央脊髓综合征(ACS)合并多系统创伤患者的神经功能结局,但关于早期手术减压的死亡率和发病率仍存在相互矛盾的报道。因此,多系统创伤患者急性中央脊髓综合征的最佳减压时机仍存在争议。本研究旨在利用倾向评分匹配法确定美国国家创伤数据库(NTDB)中多系统创伤患者急性创伤性中央脊髓早期手术与全因死亡率之间的关联。
我们使用NTDB(2011 - 2014年)进行一项回顾性队列研究,纳入年龄大于18岁、患有急性中央脊髓综合征(通过ICD - 9编码确定)的患者。收集的患者数据包括人口统计学信息、手术时机(≤24小时、>24小时)、损伤机制、查尔森合并症指数(CCI)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、严重不良事件(SAE)。采用逻辑回归和倾向匹配法研究手术时机与随后住院死亡率之间的关系。
我们确定了2379例创伤性急性中央脊髓综合征患者。该组男性占79.3%,平均年龄为56.3±15.2岁。他们的平均ISS为19.5±9.0,死亡率为3.0%(n = 72)。共有731例(30.7%)患者在24小时内接受了急性中央脊髓综合征手术。单因素分析未显示早期手术组与晚期手术组的死亡率有显著差异(3.8%对2.7%,P = 0.127)。在未调整的模型中,早期手术不能预测全样本(P = 0.129,P = 0.140)或匹配样本(P = 0.137,P = 0.280)中的死亡或严重不良事件 + 死亡情况。在调整了年龄、ISS和CCI的模型中,使用全样本时早期手术可预测死亡和严重不良事件 + 死亡情况(P = 0.013,P = 0.027),但使用倾向匹配样本时则不能(P = 0.107,P = 0.255)。
与之前的观点不同,早期手术干预似乎与急性中央脊髓综合征患者死亡率增加无关。我们推测,NTDB中记录的生存率受到包括现有合并症和多系统创伤等因素的影响,而非手术时机。延迟确定性手术治疗可能使患者更容易出现更严重的神经功能恶化。