Suppr超能文献

医生、护士和药剂师对疗养院中考虑三个行动层面的减药决定因素的看法:一项定性研究

Physicians', Nurses' and Pharmacists' Perceptions of Determinants to Deprescribing in Nursing Homes Considering Three Levels of Action: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Foley Rose-Anna, Hurard Lucie Lechevalier, Cateau Damien, Koutaissoff Daria, Bugnon Olivier, Niquille Anne

机构信息

Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

School of Health Sciences (HESAV), University of Applied sciences and Arts, Western Switzerland (HES-SO), 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Pharmacy (Basel). 2020 Feb 7;8(1):17. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8010017.

Abstract

Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications are frequent safety issues among nursing home (NH) residents. Deprescribing can significantly reduce the number of drugs used, medication costs, and mortality. This qualitative study sought to understand and compare the perceptions and practices of nurses, pharmacists, and physicians regarding deprescribing in Swiss NHs, referring to an implementation approach on three levels of action: the individual, the institution, and the healthcare system. : Two focus groups were held with 21 participants: one focus group with 11 pharmacists, another with 10 nurses and six semi-structured interviews with physicians were conducted and focused on their individual experience and practices. They were audiotaped and fully transcribed, and a content analysis was performed using to MAXQDA (Ver 12) software. (1) At an individual level, physicians were concerned by consequences of deprescribing in terms of safety. Nurses were closest to residents and stressed the importance of finding the right time, creating a bond of trust before deprescribing and considering the purpose of the stay in the NH. Pharmacists relied on structured guides for deprescribing, which led their reflection and practice. All professionals saw the complexity of the clinical situations, as well as residents' and relatives' fears of interruption of care. (2) At an institutional level, the professionals stressed the lack of time to discuss patients' health and treatment, while pre-existing interprofessional collaboration, specifically, quality circles, seemed useful tools to create common knowledge. In order to reduce prescriptions, better coordination between physicians, nurses, pharmacists and specialists seemed crucial. (3) At the health system level, funding still needs to be provided to consolidate the process, go beyond organisational constraints and ensure deprescribing serves the patient's wellbeing above all. At the individual level of implementation, the different healthcare professionals expressed specific concerns about deprescribing, depending on their defined role in NHs. Their perspective about the different levers to promote deprescribing at institutional and healthcare system levels converge towards interprofessional collaboration supported by the healthcare system. Specific funding and incentives are therefore needed to support a sustainable interprofessional team.

摘要

多重用药以及使用潜在不适当药物是疗养院(NH)居民中常见的安全问题。减药可显著减少用药数量、药物成本和死亡率。本定性研究旨在了解和比较瑞士疗养院护士、药剂师和医生对减药的看法和做法,并参考在个体、机构和医疗系统三个行动层面的实施方法。研究与21名参与者进行了两个焦点小组讨论:一个焦点小组有11名药剂师,另一个有10名护士,并对医生进行了6次半结构化访谈,重点关注他们的个人经验和做法。讨论进行了录音并全文转录,使用MAXQDA(第12版)软件进行了内容分析。(1)在个体层面,医生担心减药对安全性的影响。护士与居民关系最密切,强调找到合适时机、在减药前建立信任关系以及考虑在疗养院停留目的的重要性。药剂师依靠减药的结构化指南来指导他们的思考和实践。所有专业人员都认识到临床情况的复杂性,以及居民和亲属对护理中断的担忧。(2)在机构层面,专业人员强调缺乏讨论患者健康和治疗的时间,而现有的跨专业协作,特别是质量改进小组,似乎是创造共同知识的有用工具。为了减少处方,医生、护士、药剂师和专科医生之间更好的协调似乎至关重要。(3)在医疗系统层面,仍需提供资金以巩固这一过程,突破组织限制,并确保减药首先服务于患者的福祉。在实施的个体层面,不同的医疗专业人员对减药表达了具体担忧,这取决于他们在疗养院中所定义的角色。他们对在机构和医疗系统层面促进减药的不同手段的看法趋向于在医疗系统支持下的跨专业协作。因此,需要特定的资金和激励措施来支持一个可持续的跨专业团队。

相似文献

9
Unlocking Deprescribing Potential in Nursing Homes: Insights from a Focus Group Study with Healthcare Professionals.
Drugs Aging. 2024 Mar;41(3):261-270. doi: 10.1007/s40266-023-01092-8. Epub 2024 Jan 29.
10
Barriers and enablers towards benzodiazepine-receptor agonists deprescribing in nursing homes: A qualitative study of stakeholder groups.
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2023 Mar 31;9:100258. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100258. eCollection 2023 Mar.

引用本文的文献

6
Deprescribing interventions in older adults: An overview of systematic reviews.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 17;19(6):e0305215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305215. eCollection 2024.
8
Nurses' Experiences Concerning Older Adults with Polypharmacy: A Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jan 23;11(3):334. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11030334.
10
Evaluation of an Interprofessional Academic-Practice Partnership in End of Life Care.
Innov Pharm. 2021 Sep 22;12(4). doi: 10.24926/iip.v12i4.4004. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

4
Number of Medications and Mortality Among Residents in Nursing Homes.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 May;20(5):643-645. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.11.028. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Health care professionals' attitudes towards deprescribing in older patients with limited life expectancy: A systematic review.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 May;85(5):868-892. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13861. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
6
Health Outcomes of Deprescribing Interventions Among Older Residents in Nursing Homes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2019 Mar;20(3):362-372.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.10.026. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
7
Assessment of Attitudes Toward Deprescribing in Older Medicare Beneficiaries in the United States.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Dec 1;178(12):1673-1680. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4720.
8
Discontinuing Inappropriate Medication Use in Nursing Home Residents: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Nov 7;167(9):609-617. doi: 10.7326/M16-2729. Epub 2017 Oct 10.
10
The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;24(1):117-126. doi: 10.1111/jep.12741. Epub 2017 Mar 31.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验