MRC/UVRI & LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 12;20(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00920-4.
Outcomes in observational studies may not best estimate those expected in the HIV vaccine efficacy trials. We compared retention in Simulated HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials (SiVETs) and observational cohorts drawn from two key populations in Uganda.
Two SiVETs were nested within two observational cohorts, one in Fisherfolk (FF) and another one in Female Sex Workers (FSW). Adult participants in each observational cohort were screened for enrolment into SiVETs. Those screened-out or not screened continued participation in the observational (non-SiVET) cohorts. SiVET participants were administered a licensed hepatitis B vaccine in a schedule that mimicked an actual HIV vaccine efficacy trial. Both cohorts were followed for 12 months and retention was assessed through dropout, defined as lost to follow up, being uncontactable, refusal to continue or missing the last study clinic visit. Dropout rates were compared using Poisson models giving rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).
Out of 1525 participants (565 FF and 960 FSW), 572 (38%) were enrolled into SiVETs (282-FF and 290-FSW), and 953 (62%) remained in the non-SiVET cohorts. Overall, 326 (101 SiVET, 225 non-SiVET) dropped out in 1260 Person Years of Observation (PYO), a dropout rate of 25.9 /100 PYO (95%CI: 23.2-28.8); fewer dropped out in the SiVET cohorts (18.4, 95% CI: 15.1-22.4) than in the non-SiVET cohorts (31.6, 95% CI: 27.8-36.1), rate ratio (RR) =0.58, 95% CI: 0.46-0.73. In all cohorts, the dropout was more marked in FSW than in FF population. Duration lived in community was associated with dropout in both SiVETs and religion in both non-SiVET cohorts.
The rate of dropout was lower in SiVET compared to non-SiVET cohort. Though the difference in dropout between SiVET and non-SiVET was generally similar, the actual dropout rates were higher in the FSW population. Conduct of SiVETs in these key populations could mean that designing HIV Vaccine Efficacy Trials will benefit from lower dropout rate shown in SiVET than non-SiVET observational cohort.
观察性研究的结果可能无法最佳估计 HIV 疫苗功效试验中的预期结果。我们比较了在乌干达两个关键人群中嵌套的模拟 HIV 疫苗功效试验(SiVET)和观察队列中的保留率。
两个 SiVET 嵌套在两个观察队列中,一个在渔民(FF)中,另一个在性工作者(FSW)中。每个观察队列中的成年参与者都接受了 SiVET 的筛选。那些筛选出来或未筛选的人继续参加观察性(非 SiVET)队列。SiVET 参与者接受了一种许可的乙型肝炎疫苗接种,接种时间表模仿了实际的 HIV 疫苗功效试验。两个队列均随访 12 个月,并通过失访评估保留率,定义为失访、无法联系、拒绝继续或错过最后一次研究就诊。使用泊松模型比较辍学率,给出率比和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。
在 1525 名参与者中(565 名 FF 和 960 名 FSW),有 572 名(38%)被纳入 SiVET(282-FF 和 290-FSW),953 名(62%)留在非 SiVET 队列中。总的来说,在 1260 人年的观察(PYO)中,有 326 人(101 名 SiVET,225 名非 SiVET)辍学,辍学率为 25.9/100 PYO(95%CI:23.2-28.8);SiVET 队列的辍学人数(18.4,95%CI:15.1-22.4)少于非 SiVET 队列(31.6,95%CI:27.8-36.1),率比(RR)=0.58,95%CI:0.46-0.73。在所有队列中,FSW 的辍学率均高于 FF 人群。在 SiVET 和非 SiVET 队列中,社区居住时间与辍学有关,而宗教在非 SiVET 队列中与辍学有关。
与非 SiVET 队列相比,SiVET 的辍学率较低。尽管 SiVET 和非 SiVET 之间的辍学差异通常相似,但 FSW 人群的实际辍学率更高。在这些关键人群中开展 SiVET 意味着在设计 HIV 疫苗功效试验时,SiVET 观察性队列显示的较低辍学率将受益。