Suppr超能文献

非氨酯治疗难治性癫痫性痉挛。

Felbamate in the treatment of refractory epileptic spasms.

作者信息

Hussain Shaun A, Asilnejad Brenda, Heesch Jaeden, Navarro Mario, Ji Matthew, Shrey Daniel W, Rajaraman Rajsekar R, Sankar Raman

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine and UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

David Geffen School of Medicine and UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2020 Mar;161:106284. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106284. Epub 2020 Feb 3.

Abstract

Several small case series provide conflicting impressions of the efficacy of felbamate for treatment of epileptic spasms. Using a large single-center cohort of children with epileptic spasms, we retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of felbamate. We identified all patients with video-EEG confirmed epileptic spasms who were treated with felbamate at our center. We quantified felbamate exposure by calculating peak and weighted-average weight-based dose. Clinical response was defined as resolution of epileptic spasms for at least 28 days, beginning not more than 3 months after felbamate initiation. Electroclinical response was defined as clinical response accompanied by overnight video-EEG demonstrating freedom from epileptic spasms and hypsarrhythmia. Among a cohort of 476 infants, we identified 62 children who were treated with felbamate, of whom 58 had previously failed treatment with hormonal therapy or vigabatrin. Median peak and weighted-average felbamate dosages were 47 and 40 mg/kg/day, respectively. Five (8%) children were classified as clinical responders and two (3%) children were classified as electroclinical responders. Among 17 patients with latency from epileptic spasms onset to felbamate initiation of less than 12 months, we observed 4 (24%) clinical responders. This study suggests that felbamate may be efficacious for treatment of epileptic spasms and that further rigorous study is warranted.

摘要

几个小病例系列对非氨酯治疗癫痫性痉挛的疗效给出了相互矛盾的结论。我们使用一个大型单中心队列中患有癫痫性痉挛的儿童,回顾性评估了非氨酯的疗效和安全性。我们确定了所有在本中心接受非氨酯治疗且经视频脑电图证实患有癫痫性痉挛的患者。我们通过计算基于体重的峰值剂量和加权平均剂量来量化非氨酯暴露量。临床反应定义为癫痫性痉挛缓解至少28天,且在开始使用非氨酯后不超过3个月出现。电临床反应定义为临床反应伴有夜间视频脑电图显示无癫痫性痉挛和高度节律失调。在476名婴儿队列中,我们确定了62名接受非氨酯治疗的儿童,其中58名先前接受激素治疗或氨己烯酸治疗失败。非氨酯的峰值剂量中位数和加权平均剂量分别为47和40mg/kg/天。5名(8%)儿童被归类为临床反应者,2名(3%)儿童被归类为电临床反应者。在癫痫性痉挛发作至开始使用非氨酯的潜伏期小于12个月的17名患者中,我们观察到4名(24%)临床反应者。本研究表明非氨酯可能对癫痫性痉挛的治疗有效,有必要进行进一步的严格研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验