Milchram Markus, Suarez-Rubio Marcela, Schröder Annika, Bruckner Alexander
Institute of Zoology Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Vienna Austria.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan 28;10(3):1135-1144. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5928. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Automated recording units are commonly used by consultants to assess environmental impacts and to monitor animal populations. Although estimating population density of bats using stationary acoustic detectors is key for evaluating environmental impacts, estimating densities from call activity data is only possible through recently developed numerical methods, as the recognition of calling individuals is impossible.We tested the applicability of generalized random encounter models (gREMs) for determining population densities of three bat species (Common pipistrelle , Northern bat , and Natterer's bat ) based on passively collected acoustical data. To validate the results, we compared them to (a) density estimates from the literature and to (b) Royle-Nichols (RN) models of detection/nondetection data.Our estimates for matched both the published data and RN-model results. For , the gREM yielded similar estimates to the RN-models, but the published estimates were more than twice as high. This discrepancy might be because the high-altitude flight of is not accounted for in gREMs. Results of gREMs for were supported by published data but were ~10 times higher than those of RN-models. RN-models use detection/nondetection data, and this loss of information probably affected population estimates of very active species like .gREM models provided realistic estimates of bat population densities based on automatically recorded call activity data. However, the average flight altitude of species should be accounted for in future analyses. We suggest including flight altitude in the calculation of the detection range to assess the detection sphere more accurately and to obtain more precise density estimates.
顾问们通常使用自动记录装置来评估环境影响并监测动物种群。虽然使用固定声学探测器估计蝙蝠种群密度是评估环境影响的关键,但由于无法识别发出叫声的个体,只有通过最近开发的数值方法才能从叫声活动数据中估计密度。我们基于被动收集的声学数据,测试了广义随机相遇模型(gREMs)用于确定三种蝙蝠(普通伏翼、北方棕蝠和纳氏鼠耳蝠)种群密度的适用性。为了验证结果,我们将其与(a)文献中的密度估计值以及(b)检测/未检测数据的罗伊尔 - 尼科尔斯(RN)模型进行了比较。我们对[第一种蝙蝠]的估计值与已发表数据和RN模型结果均相符。对于[第二种蝙蝠],gREM得出的估计值与RN模型相似,但已发表的估计值高出两倍多。这种差异可能是因为gREMs没有考虑到[第二种蝙蝠]的高空飞行。gREMs对[第三种蝙蝠]的结果得到了已发表数据的支持,但比RN模型的结果高约10倍。RN模型使用检测/未检测数据,这种信息损失可能影响了对像[第三种蝙蝠]这样非常活跃物种的种群估计。gREM模型基于自动记录的叫声活动数据提供了蝙蝠种群密度的实际估计值。然而,在未来的分析中应考虑物种的平均飞行高度。我们建议在检测范围的计算中纳入飞行高度,以更准确地评估检测范围并获得更精确的密度估计值。