Huang Ri, Zhang Yadan, Wang Tao, Shen Liao, Zhang Zhen, Wang Yang, Quan Dongqin
Institute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Academy of Military Medical Sciences, Taiping Road No.27, Beijing 100850, China.
Experimental Teaching Administration Department, TianjinUniversity of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Anshan West Road No.312, Tianjin 300193, China.
Asian J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jul;13(4):343-352. doi: 10.1016/j.ajps.2018.02.001. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
We aimed to develop a novel method for assessing the bitterness of azithromycin-containing reverse micelles (AM-containing RMs). Azithromycin-containing reverse micelles were prepared by processing Lipoid E80 and medium chain triglycerides via a freeze-drying method. The bitterness threshold of azithromycin was determined by human taste test, and an equation was derived to correlate the azithromycin concentrations and bitterness scores of standard solutions. Simulated salivary fluids and sampling times were fixed based on the drug release profile of AM-containing RMs, with Zithromax (a commercial formulation of azithromycin) used as the control. The drug release concentrations from stimulated salivary fluids were then used to assess the bitterness of AM-containing RMs and Zithromax. Afterward, the oral bioavailability of both formulations was evaluated by experiments in male Wistar rats. The results showed that the bitterness threshold of azithromycin standard solutions was between 25.3 µg/ml and 30.4 µg/ml. Thereafter, we calculated that the bitterness scores and the drug release concentrations of the azithromycin-containing reverse micelle formulation were similar to those of Zithromax at each time point after 10 min of dispersal in simulated salivary fluid. In addition, the AUC after oral administration of AM-containing RMs was 1.75-fold ( < 0.05) higher than that of Zithromax. In conclusions, a system for assessing bitterness was developed using an drug release evaluation method and a human taste test panel. We found that the bitterness of azithromycin was successfully masked by reverse micelles, which also improved the oral bioavailability of azithromycin compared to that of Zithromax.
我们旨在开发一种评估含阿奇霉素反胶束(含AM的RMs)苦味的新方法。通过冷冻干燥法处理Lipoid E80和中链甘油三酯来制备含阿奇霉素反胶束。通过人体味觉测试确定阿奇霉素的苦味阈值,并推导一个方程以关联标准溶液中阿奇霉素浓度与苦味评分。根据含AM的RMs的药物释放曲线确定模拟唾液液和采样时间,以阿奇霉素的商业制剂希舒美作为对照。然后使用刺激唾液液中的药物释放浓度来评估含AM的RMs和希舒美的苦味。之后,通过在雄性Wistar大鼠身上进行实验来评估两种制剂的口服生物利用度。结果表明,阿奇霉素标准溶液的苦味阈值在25.3μg/ml至30.4μg/ml之间。此后,我们计算得出,在模拟唾液液中分散10分钟后的每个时间点,含阿奇霉素反胶束制剂的苦味评分和药物释放浓度与希舒美相似。此外,口服含AM的RMs后的AUC比希舒美高1.75倍(<0.05)。总之,使用药物释放评估方法和人体味觉测试小组开发了一种评估苦味的系统。我们发现反胶束成功掩盖了阿奇霉素的苦味,与希舒美相比,反胶束还提高了阿奇霉素的口服生物利用度。