Suppr超能文献

一项评估宾夕法尼亚州学生健康中心堕胎护理转诊情况的模拟患者研究。

A simulated patient study to assess referrals to abortion care by student health centers in Pennsylvania.

作者信息

Anand Priyanka, McAllister Arden, Hunter Tegan, Schreiber Courtney A, Koelper Nathanael, Sonalkar Sarita

机构信息

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Division of Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Spruce Street, 1000 Courtyard, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

出版信息

Contraception. 2020 Jul;102(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine college health centers' referral patterns for students seeking induced abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross-sectional simulated patient study at 4-year colleges in Pennsylvania between June 2017 and May 2018. A researcher posing as a student seeking abortion referral contacted student health centers twice during the course of the study using a structured script, once as a minor (under 18 years), and once as an adult. The primary outcome was "direct referral", defined as a referral to an abortion provider. We measured proportions of student health centers who provided no referral, "indirect referral" (referral to a non-specific provider), and "inappropriate referral" (referral to a non-abortion provider). We analyzed the relationship between the proportion of direct referrals and minor status of the caller as well as college characteristics (religious affiliation, location, student body mean income, and size). We included variables found to be significant as covariates in a generalized linear model that accounted for the cluster of multiple calls to each institution.

RESULTS

We attempted contact with 115 institutions, once as a minor and once as an adult, resulting in 202 successful contacts. Direct referral was the most common outcome (49.5%), followed by inappropriate referral (33.7%) and no referral (21.8%). The proportion of direct referrals given to minors was similar when compared to adults (48.0% vs 52.0%, OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.47-1.42). Religiously affiliated institutions were less likely to provide a direct referral than non-religiously affiliated schools (aOR 0.47, 95% CI 0.30-0.75). With each increase in students' household income tertile, health centers were more likely to provide a direct referral (aOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Half of college student health centers in Pennsylvania do not provide direct abortion referrals, and many provide inappropriate referrals. Student health centers at religiously affiliated institutions and those with poorer students are less likely to provide direct abortion referrals.

IMPLICATIONS

Student health providers should inform themselves about fake health clinics and local abortion providers. Colleges should train staff, create accurate resources and define clear policies around referral. Professional and policymaking organizations should affirm the duty of all college health centers, regardless of religious affiliation, to provide abortion referrals.

摘要

目的

确定大学健康中心对寻求人工流产学生的转诊模式。

研究设计

2017年6月至2018年5月期间,我们在宾夕法尼亚州的四年制大学开展了一项横断面模拟患者研究。一名研究人员假扮成寻求堕胎转诊的学生,在研究过程中使用结构化脚本两次联系学生健康中心,一次以未成年人(18岁以下)身份,一次以成年人身份。主要结果是“直接转诊”,定义为转介至堕胎服务提供者。我们测量了未提供转诊、“间接转诊”(转介至非特定提供者)和“不适当转诊”(转介至非堕胎服务提供者)的学生健康中心比例。我们分析了直接转诊比例与来电者未成年人身份以及大学特征(宗教归属、地理位置、学生群体平均收入和规模)之间的关系。我们将发现具有显著意义的变量作为协变量纳入广义线性模型,该模型考虑了对每个机构多次致电的聚类情况。

结果

我们尝试联系115所机构,一次以未成年人身份,一次以成年人身份,共成功联系202次。直接转诊是最常见的结果(49.5%),其次是不适当转诊(33.7%)和未转诊(21.8%)。与成年人相比,给予未成年人的直接转诊比例相似(48.0%对52.0%,比值比0.82,95%置信区间0.47 - 1.42)。宗教附属机构比非宗教附属学校提供直接转诊的可能性更小(校正后比值比0.47,95%置信区间0.30 - 0.75)。随着学生家庭收入三分位数的每一次增加,健康中心提供直接转诊的可能性更大(校正后比值比1.22,95%置信区间1.05 - 1.42)。

结论

宾夕法尼亚州一半的大学生健康中心不提供直接堕胎转诊,许多提供不适当的转诊。宗教附属机构以及学生较贫困的大学的学生健康中心提供直接堕胎转诊的可能性较小。

启示

学生健康服务提供者应了解虚假健康诊所和当地堕胎服务提供者的情况。大学应培训工作人员,创建准确的资源并围绕转诊制定明确的政策。专业和决策组织应确认所有大学健康中心,无论宗教归属如何,都有提供堕胎转诊的责任。

相似文献

1
A simulated patient study to assess referrals to abortion care by student health centers in Pennsylvania.
Contraception. 2020 Jul;102(1):23-29. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
2
"I Wasn't Expecting That Question": Responses to Requests for Abortion Referral at College Student Health Centers.
Womens Health Issues. 2024 Mar-Apr;34(2):148-155. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2023.12.003. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
3
Using a simulated patient to assess referral for abortion services in the USA.
J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;38(4):246-51. doi: 10.1136/jfprhc-2011-100176. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
4
Abortion Referral Practices among a National Sample of Obstetrician-Gynecologists.
Womens Health Issues. 2020 Nov-Dec;30(6):446-452. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2020.08.002. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
6
A Collaborative Analysis of Trends in Referrals to the Pennsylvania Student Assistance Program from 2013 to 2018.
J Sch Health. 2023 Apr;93(4):331-339. doi: 10.1111/josh.13267. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
8
Influence of clinician referral on Nebraska women's decision-to-abortion time.
Contraception. 2016 Mar;93(3):236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 16.
10
Counseling college students after a positive pregnancy test: Trends in practice.
J Am Coll Health. 2021 Feb-Mar;69(2):227-231. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2019.1657120. Epub 2019 Sep 9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验