Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, South Korea.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Yonsei University Health System, South Korea.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Sep;223(3):423.e1-423.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.037. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity, a clinical condition present in approximately 50% of patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, is often associated with intraamniotic inflammation, a risk factor for a short admission-to-delivery interval, early preterm delivery, and neonatal complications. We previously developed a transcervical amniotic fluid collector, the device that allows the collection of fluid noninvasively from the cervical canal when membrane rupture occurs.
This study was designed to determine whether rapid analysis of an interleukin-8 concentration in fluid obtained noninvasively by the transcervical amniotic fluid collector can be used to assess the risk of intraamniotic inflammation. We also compared the diagnostic performance of this point-of-care test for interleukin-8 in transcervically obtained fluid to that of a white blood cell count determined in amniotic fluid retrieved by transabdominal amniocentesis.
This prospective cohort study was conducted between October 2011 and April 2017. Fluid was retrieved through both transabdominal amniocentesis and the use of a transcervical amniotic fluid collector within 24 hours of amniocentesis in patients with a singleton pregnancy and preterm prelabor rupture of the membranes (16-35 weeks of gestation). Amniotic fluid obtained via amniocentesis was cultured for aerobic and anaerobic bacteria and genital mycoplasmas; a white blood cell count was also measured in amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic infection was diagnosed when microorganisms were identified by the cultivation of amniotic fluid. Intraamniotic inflammation was defined as an elevated amniotic fluid matrix metalloproteinase-8 concentration (>23 ng/mL) assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Interleukin-8 in cervical fluid obtained by the collector was measured by the point-of-care test that used a test strip and scanner based on the fluorescence immunochromatographic analysis in 2019. The diagnostic indices, predictive values, and likelihood ratios of the 2 different tests were calculated.
First, interleukin-8 concentration ≥9.5 ng/mL in cervical fluid, determined by the point-of-care test, was at the knee of the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and had a sensitivity of 98% (56/57; 95% confidence interval, 91-99.96%), specificity of 74% (40/54; 95% confidence interval, 60-85%), positive predictive value of 80% (56/70; 95% confidence interval, 72-86%), negative predictive value of 98% (40/41; 95% confidence interval, 85-99.6%), positive likelihood ratio of 3.79 (95% confidence interval, 2.41-5.96), and negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (95% confidence interval, 0.003-0.17) in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation; a concentration of matrix metalloproteinase-8 >23 ng/mL by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay had a prevalence of 51% (57/111). Second, a cervical fluid interleukin-8 concentration ≥9.5 ng/mL had significantly higher sensitivity than a transabdominally obtained amniotic fluid white blood cell count (≥19 cells/mm) in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation (sensitivity: 98% [95% confidence interval, 91-99.96%] vs 84% [95% confidence interval, 72-93%]; P<.05; specificity: 74% [95% confidence interval, 60-85%] vs 76% [95% confidence interval, 62-87%); positive and negative predictive values: 80% [95% confidence interval, 72-86%] and 98% [95% confidence interval, 85-99.6%] vs 79% [95% confidence interval, 69-86%] and 82% [95% confidence interval, 71-89%]) and in the identification of intraamniotic inflammation/infection (gold standard: positive culture for bacteria or a matrix metalloproteinase-8 >23 ng/mL; sensitivity: 91% [95% confidence interval, 82-97%] vs 75% [95% confidence interval, 63-85%]; P<.05).
The point-of-care test was predictive of intraamniotic inflammation, based on the determination of interleukin-8 in fluid retrieved by a transcervical amniotic fluid collector. Therefore, the analysis of cervically obtained fluid by such point-of-care test may be used to noninvasively monitor intraamniotic inflammation in patients with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes.
微生物侵入羊膜腔,这是约 50%的胎膜早破患者的临床状况,通常与羊膜腔内炎症相关,这是短入院至分娩间隔、早产及早产儿并发症的危险因素。我们之前开发了一种经宫颈羊水采集器,当胎膜破裂时,该装置可以非侵入性地从宫颈管采集羊水。
本研究旨在确定经宫颈羊水采集器非侵入性采集的液体中白细胞介素-8 浓度的快速分析是否可用于评估羊膜腔内炎症的风险。我们还比较了经腹羊膜穿刺术和经宫颈羊水采集器采集的液体中白细胞介素-8 的点检测与经腹羊膜穿刺术获得的羊水白细胞计数的诊断性能。
本前瞻性队列研究于 2011 年 10 月至 2017 年 4 月进行。在胎膜早破(16-35 周妊娠)的单胎妊娠患者中,在羊膜穿刺术 24 小时内通过经腹羊膜穿刺术和经宫颈羊水采集器两种方法采集羊水。通过羊膜穿刺术获得的羊水进行需氧菌和厌氧菌以及生殖支原体培养;还测量了羊水的白细胞计数。当通过羊水培养鉴定出微生物时,诊断为羊膜内感染。羊膜腔内炎症定义为酶联免疫吸附试验测定的羊膜基质金属蛋白酶-8 浓度升高(>23ng/mL)。2019 年,采用基于荧光免疫层析分析的检测条和扫描仪,通过床边检测检测采集器宫颈液中的白细胞介素-8。计算了两种不同检测方法的诊断指标、预测值和似然比。
首先,床边检测确定的宫颈液中白细胞介素-8 浓度≥9.5ng/mL 位于受试者工作特征曲线分析的拐点,具有 98%(56/57;95%置信区间,91-99.96%)的敏感性、74%(40/54;95%置信区间,60-85%)的特异性、80%(56/70;95%置信区间,72-86%)的阳性预测值、98%(40/41;95%置信区间,85-99.6%)的阴性预测值、3.79(95%置信区间,2.41-5.96)的阳性似然比和 0.02(95%置信区间,0.003-0.17)的阴性似然比,用于识别羊膜内炎症;酶联免疫吸附试验测定的基质金属蛋白酶-8 浓度>23ng/mL 的患病率为 51%(57/111)。其次,宫颈液白细胞介素-8 浓度≥9.5ng/mL 对羊膜内炎症的识别具有比经腹获得的羊水白细胞计数(≥19 个细胞/mm)更高的敏感性(敏感性:98%[95%置信区间,91-99.96%] vs 84%[95%置信区间,72-93%];P<0.05;特异性:74%[95%置信区间,60-85%] vs 76%[95%置信区间,62-87%]),阳性和阴性预测值(80%[95%置信区间,72-86%]和 98%[95%置信区间,85-99.6%] vs 79%[95%置信区间,69-86%]和 82%[95%置信区间,71-89%]),以及羊膜内炎症/感染的识别(金标准:细菌阳性培养或基质金属蛋白酶-8>23ng/mL;敏感性:91%[95%置信区间,82-97%] vs 75%[95%置信区间,63-85%];P<0.05)。
基于经宫颈羊水采集器采集的液体中白细胞介素-8 的测定,床边检测可预测羊膜内炎症。因此,通过这种床边检测分析宫颈采集的液体可能用于非侵入性监测胎膜早破患者的羊膜内炎症。