Suppr超能文献

中性抗干扰素-γ自身抗体患者的误诊。

Incorrect diagnoses in patients with neutralizing anti-interferon-gamma-autoantibodies.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan; Center of Infection Control, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Dec;26(12):1684.e1-1684.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.030. Epub 2020 Feb 28.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Early diagnosis of adult-onset immunodeficiency associated with neutralizing anti-interferon-gamma autoantibodies (anti-IFNγ Abs) remains difficult given the lack of a distinctive phenotype and a routine test. This study aimed to investigate the determinants of incorrect tentative diagnoses and useful clues for early disease recognition.

METHODS

This study enrolled adult patients who had unexplained opportunistic infections diagnosed at six hospitals and identified those having neutralizing anti-IFNγ Abs (cases). Demographics, medical history, initial presentations and laboratory data, causative pathogens, tentative diagnoses, and treatment were analysed and compared among individuals having neutralizing anti-IFNγ Abs (cases) and those without (controls).

RESULTS

Among the 154 patients enrolled, neutralizing anti-IFN-γ Abs were detected in 50 (71%) of 70 patients with disseminated non-tuberculous mycobacterial infection (dNTM) but not in 84 patients without dNTM. The median time from disease onset to the recognition of dNTM associated with neutralizing anti-IFNγ Abs was 1.6 years (range, 0.25-19 years). Incorrect tentative diagnoses resulted in the administration of anti-tuberculosis regimens (60%, 30/50), immunosuppressants (48%, 24/50), and systemic chemotherapy (2%, 10/50) to the 50 cases. Multivariate analysis revealed that case patients were more likely than controls to present with multiple bone lesions (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 27.16; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.21-609.59) and leukocytosis (adjusted OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.12-1.95); however, the controls had a higher rate of mycobacterial bloodstream infection (adjusted OR, 0.05; 95% CI 0.00-0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of incorrect tentative diagnoses led to frequent inappropriate management in patients with neutralizing anti-IFNγ Abs, and highlighted the need for increased awareness among clinicians.

摘要

目的

由于缺乏独特的表型和常规检测,成人发病的、与中和型抗干扰素-γ 自身抗体(抗-IFNγ Abs)相关的免疫缺陷的早期诊断仍然较为困难。本研究旨在探究错误暂定诊断的决定因素和早期疾病识别的有用线索。

方法

本研究纳入了在六家医院诊断为不明原因机会性感染的成年患者,并鉴定出具有中和型抗 IFNγ Abs(病例)的患者。对个体的人口统计学、病史、初始表现和实验室数据、病原体、暂定诊断和治疗进行了分析和比较,比较了具有中和型抗 IFNγ Abs(病例)的患者和没有中和型抗 IFNγ Abs(对照)的患者。

结果

在纳入的 154 名患者中,在 70 名患有播散性非结核分枝杆菌感染(dNTM)的患者中检测到 50 名(71%)患者具有中和型抗 IFNγ Abs,而在 84 名没有 dNTM 的患者中没有检测到。从发病到识别与中和型抗 IFNγ Abs 相关的 dNTM 的中位时间为 1.6 年(范围,0.25-19 年)。错误的暂定诊断导致 50 例患者接受了抗结核方案(60%,30/50)、免疫抑制剂(48%,24/50)和全身化疗(2%,10/50)的治疗。多变量分析显示,病例患者比对照组更有可能出现多发性骨病变(调整后的优势比(OR),27.16;95%置信区间(CI),1.21-609.59)和白细胞增多症(调整后的 OR,1.48;95%CI,1.12-1.95);然而,对照组更有可能发生分枝杆菌血流感染(调整后的 OR,0.05;95%CI 0.00-0.66)。

结论

由于错误的暂定诊断率较高,导致具有中和型抗 IFNγ Abs 的患者经常接受不适当的治疗,这凸显了临床医生提高认识的必要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验