Department of Emergency Surgery, St. Orsola University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy.
Department of Emergency Surgery, St. Orsola University Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy -
Minerva Chir. 2020 Jun;75(3):141-152. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08228-0. Epub 2020 Mar 4.
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy represents the gold standard technique for the treatment of lithiasic gallbladder disease. Although it has many advantages, laparoscopic cholecystectomy is not risk-free and in special situations there is a need for conversion into an open procedure, in order to minimize postoperative complications and to complete the procedure safely. The aim of this study was to identify factors that can predict the conversion to open cholecystectomy.
We analyzed 1323 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy over the last five years at St. Orsola University Hospital-Bologna and Umberto I University Hospital-Rome. Among these, 116 patients (8.7%) were converted into laparotomic cholecystectomy. Clinical, demographic, surgical and pathological data from these patients were included in a prospective database. A univariate analysis was performed followed by a multivariate logistic regression.
On univariate analysis, the factors significantly correlated with conversion to open were the ASA score higher than 3 and the comorbidity, specifically cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic renal failure (P<0.001). Patients with a higher mean age had a higher risk of conversion to open (61.9±17.1 vs. 54.1±15.2, P<0.001). Previous abdominal surgery and previous episodes of cholecystitis and/or pancreatitis were not statistically significant factors for conversion. There were four deaths in the group of converted patients and two in the laparoscopic group (P<0.001). Operative morbility was higher in the conversion group (22% versus 8%, P<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that the factors significantly correlated to conversion were: age <65 years old (P=0.031 OR: 1.6), ASA score 3-4 (P=0.013, OR:1.8), history of ERCP (P=0.16 OR:1.7), emergency procedure (P=0.011, OR:1.7); CRP higher than 0,5 (P<0.001, OR:3.3), acute cholecystitis (P<0.001, OR:1.4). Further multivariate analysis of morbidity, postoperative mortality and home discharge showed that conversion had a significant influence on overall post-operative complications (P=0.011, OR:2.01), while mortality (P=0.143) and discharge at home were less statistically influenced.
Our results show that most of the independent risk factors for conversion cannot be modified by delaying surgery. Many factors reported in the literature did not significantly impact conversion rates in our results.
腹腔镜胆囊切除术是治疗胆石性胆囊疾病的金标准技术。尽管它有很多优点,但腹腔镜胆囊切除术并非没有风险,在特殊情况下需要转为开腹手术,以最大限度地减少术后并发症并安全完成手术。本研究旨在确定可预测转为开腹手术的因素。
我们分析了过去五年在圣奥尔索拉大学医院-博洛尼亚和翁贝托一世大学医院-罗马接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的 1323 名患者。其中,116 名患者(8.7%)转为开腹胆囊切除术。这些患者的临床、人口统计学、手术和病理数据被纳入一个前瞻性数据库。我们进行了单因素分析,然后进行了多变量逻辑回归。
单因素分析显示,与转为开腹手术相关的因素是 ASA 评分大于 3 分和合并症,特别是心血管疾病、糖尿病和慢性肾衰竭(P<0.001)。年龄较大的患者转为开腹手术的风险更高(61.9±17.1 岁 vs. 54.1±15.2 岁,P<0.001)。既往腹部手术、既往胆囊炎和/或胰腺炎发作不是转为开腹手术的统计学显著因素。在转为开腹手术的患者中有 4 例死亡,腹腔镜组有 2 例死亡(P<0.001)。手术发病率在转为开腹手术组较高(22%比 8%,P<0.001)。多因素分析显示,与转为开腹手术相关的因素是:年龄<65 岁(P=0.031,OR:1.6)、ASA 评分 3-4 分(P=0.013,OR:1.8)、ERCP 史(P=0.16,OR:1.7)、急诊手术(P=0.011,OR:1.7);CRP 高于 0.5(P<0.001,OR:3.3)、急性胆囊炎(P<0.001,OR:1.4)。进一步对发病率、术后死亡率和出院情况进行多因素分析显示,转为开腹手术对整体术后并发症有显著影响(P=0.011,OR:2.01),而死亡率(P=0.143)和出院在家的影响较小。
我们的结果表明,大多数可转化为独立风险因素的因素无法通过延迟手术来改变。我们的结果中,许多文献报道的因素并未显著影响转化率。