Clalit Research Institute, Clalit Health Services, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Social Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Hushi Ave., Mount Carmel, 3498838, Haifa, Israel.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 May;35(5):1484-1489. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05739-9. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
Predictive models based on electronic health records (EHRs) are used to identify patients at high risk for 30-day hospital readmission. However, these models' ability to accurately detect who could benefit from inclusion in prevention interventions, also termed "perceived impactibility", has yet to be realized.
We aimed to explore healthcare providers' perspectives of patient characteristics associated with decisions about which patients should be referred to readmission prevention programs (RPPs) beyond the EHR preadmission readmission detection model (PREADM).
This cross-sectional study employed a multi-source mixed-method design, combining EHR data with nurses' and physicians' self-reported surveys from 15 internal medicine units in three general hospitals in Israel between May 2016 and June 2017, using a mini-Delphi approach.
Nurses and physicians were asked to provide information about patients 65 years or older who were hospitalized at least one night.
We performed a decision-tree analysis to identify characteristics for consideration when deciding whether a patient should be included in an RPP.
We collected 817 questionnaires on 435 patients. PREADM score and RPP inclusion were congruent in 65% of patients, whereas 19% had a high PREADM score but were not referred to an RPP, and 16% had a low-medium PREADM score but were referred to an RPP. The decision-tree analysis identified five patient characteristics that were statistically associated with RPP referral: high PREADM score, eligibility for a nursing home, having a condition not under control, need for social-services support, and need for special equipment at home.
Our study provides empirical evidence for the partial congruence between classifications of a high PREADM score and perceived impactibility. Findings emphasize the need for additional research to understand the extent to which combining EHR data with provider insights leads to better selection of patients for RPP inclusion.
基于电子健康记录(EHR)的预测模型用于识别 30 天内住院再入院风险较高的患者。然而,这些模型准确识别谁可能受益于预防干预的能力,也称为“感知可影响性”,尚未实现。
我们旨在探讨医疗保健提供者对患者特征的看法,这些特征与决定将哪些患者转介至再入院预防计划(RPP)有关,超出了电子健康记录入院前再入院检测模型(PREADM)。
本横断面研究采用多源混合方法设计,结合 EHR 数据和以色列三家综合医院 15 个内科病房的护士和医生自我报告的调查,于 2016 年 5 月至 2017 年 6 月期间使用微型德尔菲法。
护士和医生被要求提供至少住院一晚的 65 岁及以上患者的信息。
我们进行了决策树分析,以确定在决定患者是否应纳入 RPP 时需要考虑的特征。
我们收集了 817 份关于 435 名患者的问卷。在 65%的患者中,PREADM 评分和 RPP 纳入是一致的,而 19%的患者 PREADM 评分高但未被转介至 RPP,16%的患者 PREADM 评分低-中但被转介至 RPP。决策树分析确定了与 RPP 转介相关的五个患者特征:高 PREADM 评分、有资格入住养老院、有未得到控制的疾病、需要社会服务支持和需要特殊的家庭设备。
本研究为高 PREADM 评分分类与感知可影响性之间的部分一致性提供了经验证据。研究结果强调需要进一步研究,以了解结合 EHR 数据和提供者见解在多大程度上导致更好地选择患者纳入 RPP。