London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 May;25(5):508-524. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13388. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
To identify and assess the evidence for interventions to reduce stigma experienced by children with disabilities and their families in low- and middle-income settings.
Systematic review of seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, PsycINFO, Social Policy and Practice, CINAHL, IBSS) for studies of interventions that aimed to reduce stigma for children with disabilities published from January 2000 to April 2018. Data were extracted on study population, study design, intervention level(s) and target group, and type(s) of stigma addressed. A narrative approach was used to synthesise the results.
Twenty studies were included. The majority (65%) of interventions targeted enacted stigma (negative attitudes) and the most common intervention approach was education/training (63%). Over half (54%) of interventions were delivered at the organisational/institutional level, and only four studies targeted more than one social level. The most common disability targeted was epilepsy (50%) followed by intellectual impairment (20%). The majority of studies (n = 18/20, 90%) found a reduction in a component of stigma; however, most (90%) studies had a high risk of bias.
This review highlights the lack of quality evidence on effective stigma-reduction strategies for children with disabilities. Validation and consistent use of contextually relevant scales to measure stigma may advance this field of research. Studies that involve people with disabilities in the design and implementation of these strategies are needed.
识别和评估减少中低收入环境中残疾儿童及其家庭所经历污名的干预措施的证据。
对 2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 4 月发表的旨在减少残疾儿童污名的干预措施的研究进行了 7 个数据库(MEDLINE、EMBASE、全球卫生、PsycINFO、社会政策与实践、CINAHL、IBSS)的系统评价。提取了关于研究人群、研究设计、干预水平和目标群体以及所涉及的污名类型的信息。采用叙述性方法综合结果。
共纳入 20 项研究。大多数干预措施(65%)针对实施的污名(负面态度),最常见的干预方法是教育/培训(63%)。超过一半(54%)的干预措施在组织/机构层面实施,只有 4 项研究针对多个社会层面。最常见的残疾目标是癫痫(50%),其次是智力障碍(20%)。大多数研究(n=18/20,90%)发现污名的一个组成部分减少;然而,大多数(90%)研究存在高偏倚风险。
本综述强调了缺乏针对残疾儿童有效减少污名策略的高质量证据。验证和一致使用与上下文相关的量表来衡量污名可能会推进这一研究领域。需要让残疾人士参与这些策略的设计和实施的研究。