Blackstone Nicole Tichenor, Conrad Zach
Division of Agriculture, Food, and Environment, Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Health Sciences, William & Mary, Williamsburg, VA, USA.
Curr Dev Nutr. 2020 Feb 4;4(3):nzaa015. doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzaa015. eCollection 2020 Mar.
The purpose of this research was to compare the global reference diet from the EAT-Lancet Commission on Healthy Diets from Sustainable Food Systems (EAT-Lancet) with the healthy eating patterns from the 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA). Conversion factors were developed to quantitatively compare the patterns. These factors are provided to enable investigators to incorporate the EAT-Lancet diet into analyses while maintaining relevance to US-based dietary guidance. Our findings show several areas of agreement between EAT-Lancet and the DGA but key differences in the amounts of whole grains, fruit, starchy vegetables, red meat, nuts and seeds, and discretionary calories. Many of the differences between the patterns reflect divergent approaches to developing dietary recommendations, not only methodologically but also regarding whether current food consumption patterns are considered as constraints on recommendations. Continued interdisciplinary collaboration is needed to advance dietary guidance that promotes sustainable nutrition.
本研究的目的是比较可持续食物系统健康饮食的EAT-柳叶刀委员会(EAT-柳叶刀)提出的全球参考饮食与《2015-2020年美国膳食指南》(DGA)中的健康饮食模式。制定了转换因子以对这些模式进行定量比较。提供这些因子是为了使研究人员能够将EAT-柳叶刀饮食纳入分析,同时保持与美国饮食指南的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,EAT-柳叶刀和DGA在几个方面达成了一致,但在全谷物、水果、淀粉类蔬菜、红肉、坚果和种子的摄入量以及 discretionary calories方面存在关键差异。这些模式之间的许多差异反映了制定饮食建议的不同方法,不仅在方法上,而且在是否将当前的食物消费模式视为对建议的限制方面。需要持续的跨学科合作来推进促进可持续营养的饮食指南。