Tchorz J P, Wrbas K T, Von See C, Vach K, Patzelt Sbm
Department of Operative Dentistry, Periodontology, and Endodontology, Center for Operative Dentistry, University of Dental Medicine and Oral Health, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria, Department of Operative Dentistry and Periodontology, Center for Dental Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Center for CAD/CAM and Digital Dentistry, Danube Private University, Krems, Austria.
Eur Endod J. 2018 Nov 13;4(1):28-32. doi: 10.14744/eej.2018.46320. eCollection 2019.
This study aims to evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional root canal length measurements performed by dentists with different experience levels using a special software based on cone beam com-puted tomography (CBCT).
A CBCT scan of an artificial resin maxillary molar was used to train dentists (n=65) in using the software (3D Endo, DentsplySirona, Ballaigues, Switzerland) as part of a continuing education course. At the beginning, each participant completed a questionnaire on endodontic and CBCT experiences. After com-prehensive instructions, each participant performed an entire three-dimensional treatment plan by tracing the root canal anatomy between the apical foramen and the center of the canal orifice and simulating a straight-line access. The final root canal length was indicated after the virtual rubber stop of a simulated instrument was adapted to the adjoining cusp. To evaluate the individual accuracy in terms of trueness and precision, differences between the three-dimensional planning and the actual root canal length (ARCL) were calculated, and statistically analyzed.
Mean absolute differences between the measurements with the 3D Endo™ software (n=260) and the ARCL were 0.30±0.22 mm. All measurements were within a limit of ±1 mm. The accuracy of root canal length measurements was significantly influenced by the type of root canal (p<0.0001). The smallest devia-tions were observed for the palatal root canal (0.18±0.13 mm), followed by the mesiobuccal (0.26±0.22 mm), the distobuccal (0.32±0.17 mm), and the second mesiobuccal root canal (0.46±0.24 mm).
Within the limitations of this study, the 3D Endo software enables reproducible and accurate root canal length measurements as part of a three-dimensional endodontic treatment plan. However, mea-surements should always be clinically verified, as root canal morphology has a statistically significant influence.
本研究旨在评估不同经验水平的牙医使用基于锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的特殊软件进行三维根管长度测量的准确性。
作为继续教育课程的一部分,使用人工树脂上颌磨牙的CBCT扫描来培训牙医(n = 65)使用该软件(3D Endo,登士柏西诺德,瑞士巴莱格)。开始时,每位参与者完成一份关于牙髓病学和CBCT经验的问卷。经过全面指导后,每位参与者通过描绘根尖孔与根管口中心之间的根管解剖结构并模拟直线入路来完成整个三维治疗计划。在模拟器械的虚拟橡胶止动器与相邻牙尖适配后,指示最终的根管长度。为了评估个体在准确性和精密度方面的准确性,计算并统计分析三维规划与实际根管长度(ARCL)之间的差异。
使用3D Endo™软件(n = 260)测量与ARCL之间的平均绝对差异为0.30±0.22 mm。所有测量值均在±1 mm的范围内。根管长度测量的准确性受根管类型的显著影响(p < 0.0001)。腭侧根管的偏差最小(0.18±0.13 mm),其次是近中颊侧(0.26±0.22 mm)、远中颊侧(0.32±0.17 mm)和第二近中颊侧根管(0.46±0.24 mm)。
在本研究的局限性内,3D Endo软件作为三维牙髓治疗计划的一部分,能够进行可重复且准确的根管长度测量。然而,由于根管形态具有统计学上的显著影响,测量结果应始终进行临床验证。