Leicester Medical School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Clinical Psychology, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Med Educ. 2020 Sep;54(9):796-810. doi: 10.1111/medu.14150. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
With many health and social care schools offering mindfulness training (MT) there is a need for deeper understanding about pedagogical issues. Despite encouraging findings showing relationships between MT and student stress reduction, there is little qualitative synthesis of the literature about best principles for teaching and learning.
We report on a qualitative scoping review using the stages of Arksey and O'Malley's framework. The search identified papers from MEDLINE, PsychINFO, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) and SCOPUS over 15 years. The included papers were synthesised using the 3P model of teaching and learning to explore current MT for presage (teaching set-up), process (teaching delivery) and product (outcomes) factors.
A total of 16 articles were included in the review. There was a lack of consensus on definition of MT, facilitator training and the intervention used. The majority of studies involved small self-selected, mainly female cohorts. For the set-up (presage factors), the majority of curricula included MT for stress management and well-being, delivered in the early years. Providing appropriate facilitators was a concern, whereas process factors revealed enormous variability in delivery. Few studies had formal assessment, although many had outcome evaluation measures (product factors).
The qualitative review has highlighted additional benefits from MT aside from stress reduction; most noticeably, student self-awareness, peer cohesion and group support, ability to attend to patients, and student insights into health and social education culture. Seeking presage, process and product factors has illuminated variability in how MT is being adapted within health and social care curricula. This review highlights the next steps and recommendations for the future.
许多健康和社会保健学校提供正念训练(MT),因此需要更深入地了解教学方面的问题。尽管有令人鼓舞的发现表明 MT 与学生压力减轻之间存在关系,但关于教学和学习最佳原则的文献很少进行定性综合。
我们使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架的阶段报告了一项定性范围审查。该搜索在 15 年以上的时间里从 MEDLINE、PsychINFO、CINAHL(护理和联合健康文献累积索引)和 SCOPUS 中确定了论文。使用教学的 3P 模型综合纳入的论文,以探索当前 MT 的先见(教学设置)、过程(教学交付)和产品(结果)因素。
共纳入 16 篇文章进行综述。对于 MT 的定义、培训师培训和使用的干预措施,没有达成共识。大多数研究涉及小的、自我选择的、主要是女性的队列。对于设置(先见因素),大多数课程都包括 MT 用于压力管理和幸福感,在早期阶段提供。提供合适的培训师是一个问题,而过程因素则显示出交付方面的巨大差异。很少有研究进行正式评估,尽管许多研究都有结果评估措施(产品因素)。
定性审查除了减轻压力之外,还强调了 MT 的其他好处;最值得注意的是,学生的自我意识、同伴凝聚力和团体支持、关注患者的能力,以及学生对健康和社会教育文化的洞察力。寻求先见、过程和产品因素阐明了 MT 在健康和社会保健课程中适应的差异。本综述强调了未来的步骤和建议。