Suppr超能文献

荷兰特应性皮炎和银屑病患者与医生共同决策的现状及需求:一项在线调查研究

The current extent of and need for shared decision making in atopic dermatitis and psoriasis in the Netherlands: an online survey study amongst patients and physicians.

作者信息

van der Kraaij G E, Vermeulen F M, Smeets P M G, Smets E M A, Spuls P I

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Nov;34(11):2574-2583. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16340. Epub 2020 Jul 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In shared decision making (SDM), patients and physicians work together to choose the best treatment option for an individual patient. Atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis are particularly suitable for SDM, considering that the best treatment option depends on a patient's preferences and values (preference-sensitive decisions). Currently, it is unknown to what extent SDM is applied in treatment decisions for these diseases in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES

Primary, to assess the current extent of SDM in AD and psoriasis in the Netherlands amongst patients and dermatologists. Secondary, to assess the degree to which patients and physicians endorse SDM, to explore which characteristics are related to their preference to be involved in SDM and to identify which barriers and facilitators for SDM they perceive.

METHODS

Two similar online surveys, one for patients with AD or psoriasis and one for (resident) dermatologists, were carried out. The surveys comprised validated questionnaires (shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q; range 0-100), Control Preference Scale) and study-specific statements mainly regarding barriers and facilitators for SDM.

RESULTS

The responses of 219 patients and 147 physicians were analysed. Dermatologists experienced significantly more SDM than patients (SDM-Q 82 vs 55; P < 0.01). Most patients and dermatologists prefer to share treatment decisions. Mainly facilitators for SDM were perceived, including the positive perception of patients and dermatologists regarding SDM. The perceived barriers included lack of continuity of care by the same physician and lack of time.

CONCLUSION

Despite the dermatologists' optimistic perspective, patients experience a limited extent of SDM and physicians should be aware of this gap. Improvement of SDM in AD and psoriasis is needed. The positive attitude of patients and dermatologists towards the process and outcome of SDM is important facilitators, while barriers were mainly perceived on an organizational level.

摘要

背景

在共同决策(SDM)中,患者和医生共同努力为个体患者选择最佳治疗方案。考虑到最佳治疗方案取决于患者的偏好和价值观(偏好敏感决策),特应性皮炎(AD)和银屑病尤其适合共同决策。目前,在荷兰,共同决策在这些疾病治疗决策中的应用程度尚不清楚。

目的

首要目标是评估荷兰患者和皮肤科医生中,共同决策在AD和银屑病治疗中的当前应用程度。次要目标是评估患者和医生对共同决策的认可程度,探讨哪些特征与他们参与共同决策的偏好相关,并确定他们所感知到的共同决策的障碍和促进因素。

方法

开展了两项类似的在线调查,一项针对AD或银屑病患者,另一项针对(住院)皮肤科医生。调查包括经过验证的问卷(共同决策问卷(SDM-Q;范围0-100)、控制偏好量表)以及主要关于共同决策障碍和促进因素的特定研究声明。

结果

分析了219名患者和147名医生的回复。皮肤科医生经历的共同决策明显多于患者(SDM-Q 82对55;P<0.01)。大多数患者和皮肤科医生倾向于共享治疗决策。主要感知到的是共同决策的促进因素,包括患者和皮肤科医生对共同决策的积极看法。感知到的障碍包括同一名医生缺乏连续护理以及时间不足。

结论

尽管皮肤科医生持乐观态度,但患者经历的共同决策程度有限,医生应意识到这一差距。AD和银屑病的共同决策需要改进。患者和皮肤科医生对共同决策过程和结果的积极态度是重要的促进因素,而障碍主要在组织层面被感知到。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0b69/7818257/04e87dbfdee0/JDV-34-2574-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验