Suppr超能文献

高成本低收益:系统评价和荟萃分析评估减肥手术前常规术前上消化道内镜检查的成本。

High Cost for Low Yield: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis to Assess Cost of Routine Preoperative Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Before Bariatric Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine.

Brown School of Social Work.

出版信息

J Clin Gastroenterol. 2020 May/Jun;54(5):398-404. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001334.

Abstract

Routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is an area of continued controversy in the preoperative evaluation for bariatric surgery; more information is needed regarding its impact on surgical management and associated costs. This systematic review and meta-analysis reports rates of abnormalities detected on preoperative EGD that changed operative management or delayed bariatric surgery. Sensitivity analysis examined the impact of controversial findings of hiatal hernia, Helicobacter pylori, gastritis, peptic ulcer disease. Data were used to calculate the cost per surgical alteration made due to abnormalities detected by routine EGD, compactly termed "cost-of-routine-EGD." Thirty-one retrospective observational studies were included. Meta-analysis found 3.9% of EGDs resulted in a change in operative management; this proportion decreased to 0.3% after sensitivity analysis, as detection of hiatal hernia comprised 85.7% of findings that changed operative management. Half of the 7.5% of cases that resulted in surgical delay involved endoscopic detection of H. pylori. Gastric pathology was detected in a significantly greater proportion of symptomatic patients (65.0%) than in asymptomatic patients (34.1%; P<0.001). Cost-of-routine-EGD to identify an abnormality that changed operative management was $601,060, after excluding controversial findings. The cost-of-routine-EGD to identify any abnormality that led to a change in type of bariatric operation was $281,230 and $766,352 when controversial findings were included versus excluded, respectively. Cost-of-routine-EGD to identify a malignancy was $2,554,506. Cost-of-routine-EGD is high relative to the low proportion of abnormalities that alter bariatric surgery. Our results highlight the need to develop alternative strategies to preoperative screening, in order to improve access and decrease cost associated with bariatric surgery.

摘要

常规食管胃十二指肠镜检查(EGD)在减重手术的术前评估中存在持续争议;需要更多关于其对手术管理和相关成本影响的信息。本系统评价和荟萃分析报告了术前 EGD 检测到的异常改变手术管理或延迟减重手术的发生率。敏感性分析检查了食管裂孔疝、幽门螺杆菌、胃炎、消化性溃疡病等有争议发现的影响。数据用于计算因常规 EGD 检测到的异常而导致的手术改变的每例成本,简称为“常规 EGD 成本”。共纳入 31 项回顾性观察性研究。荟萃分析发现 3.9%的 EGD 导致手术管理发生变化;敏感性分析后这一比例降至 0.3%,因为食管裂孔疝的检出占改变手术管理的发现的 85.7%。导致手术延迟的 7.5%病例中,有一半涉及内镜检测到 H. pylori。胃病理在有症状患者中的检出比例明显高于无症状患者(65.0%比 34.1%;P<0.001)。排除有争议的发现后,为确定改变手术管理的异常而进行的常规 EGD 的成本为 601,060 美元。排除有争议的发现后,为确定导致减重手术类型改变的任何异常而进行的常规 EGD 的成本为 281,230 美元,纳入有争议的发现时为 766,352 美元。为确定恶性肿瘤而进行的常规 EGD 的成本为 2,554,506 美元。常规 EGD 的成本相对于改变减重手术的异常比例较高。我们的研究结果强调需要制定替代术前筛查策略,以改善获得途径并降低与减重手术相关的成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验