The First Affiliating Hospital of Nanjing Medical University &Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
The First Affiliating Hospital of Nanjing Medical University &Jiangsu Province Hospital, 300 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210029, China.
Injury. 2020 Apr;51(4):955-963. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.111. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Shear humeral capitellum fracture (CF) treatment can be complicated by comminution of the distal lateral humeral column (LHC). Although treatment with a 3.5 mm posterolateral distal humerus plate with support (PDHPWS) has been proposed, its indications have not yet been outlined. The purpose of this study was to describe a classification system for this fracture pattern and provide a therapeutic algorithm to avoid complications associated with PDHPWS fixation.
Thirty-four patients who underwent surgical treatment for CF with LHC comminution were enrolled. The humeral capitellum angle (α angle) measured on the sagittal view of computed tomography reconstructions corresponded to the height of the LHC fracture line; based on this height, the severity of LHC injury was categorized as subtype L (low fracture line, 60° < α < 90°), subtype M (moderate fracture line, 45° < α < 60°) or subtype H (high fracture line, α < 45°). The therapeutic algorithm was countersunk compression screws for subtype L, lateral buttressing combined with/without an anterior antiglide mini-fragment plate for subtype M and a dorsolateral anatomical locking plate for subtype H. At the end of the follow-up period, the treatment outcome was evaluated by radiography and an assessment of the range of motion. A functional assessment was carried out using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score.
The mean age of patients in this cohort was 49.6 ± 14.6 years, and the mean follow-up duration was 48.9 ± 34.6 months. There were 10 cases classified as subtype L, with a mean α angle of 80.6 ± 8.8°. The mean α angle for the 13 cases classified as subtype M was 52.1 ± 4.6° and that for the 11 cases classified as subtype H was 24.1 ± 22.4°. All fractures healed uneventfully, and implant removal was required in 8 cases (one subtype M and seven subtype H). The average MEPS in the three subgroups was 84.5 (subtype L), 87.3 (subtype M) and 78.2 (subtype H), while the average DASH score was 13.9 (subtype L), 11.6 (subtype M) and 21.5 (subtype H). Compared with the other subtypes, subtype H showed the smallest improvement in mean elbow function (112.7° in flexion, 13.6° in extension, 66.4° in pronation and 71.4° in supination). No cases of heterotopic ossification or avascular necrosis of the capitellum developed in any group.
By analyzing the fracture morphology, a substantial portion of CFs with mild to moderate LHC comminution could be successfully managed by a simpler and less aggressive method with fewer complications than PDHPWS.
Level IV; Case Series; Treatment Study.
肱骨小头剪切骨折(CF)的治疗可能因肱骨远端外侧柱(LHC)粉碎而变得复杂。虽然已经提出了使用 3.5mm 后侧肱骨远端钢板加支撑(PDHPWS)进行治疗,但尚未明确其适应证。本研究的目的是描述这种骨折模式的分类系统,并提供治疗算法以避免与 PDHPWS 固定相关的并发症。
纳入了 34 例接受手术治疗的伴有 LHC 粉碎的 CF 患者。肱骨小头角(α 角)在 CT 重建的矢状位上测量,与 LHC 骨折线的高度相对应;基于此高度,将 LHC 损伤的严重程度分为 L 亚型(低骨折线,60°<α<90°)、M 亚型(中骨折线,45°<α<60°)或 H 亚型(高骨折线,α<45°)。治疗算法为 L 亚型采用埋头加压螺钉,M 亚型采用外侧支撑结合/不结合前向防旋微型板,H 亚型采用背外侧解剖锁定板。在随访期末,通过影像学和运动范围评估来评估治疗结果。使用 Mayo 肘部功能评分(MEPS)和上肢残疾问卷(DASH)评分进行功能评估。
本队列患者的平均年龄为 49.6±14.6 岁,平均随访时间为 48.9±34.6 个月。10 例患者被归类为 L 亚型,平均 α 角为 80.6±8.8°。13 例 M 亚型患者的平均 α 角为 52.1±4.6°,11 例 H 亚型患者的平均 α 角为 24.1±22.4°。所有骨折均愈合良好,8 例(1 例 M 亚型,7 例 H 亚型)需要取出内固定。三组的平均 MEPS 分别为 84.5(L 亚型)、87.3(M 亚型)和 78.2(H 亚型),平均 DASH 评分分别为 13.9(L 亚型)、11.6(M 亚型)和 21.5(H 亚型)。与其他亚型相比,H 亚型的平均肘部功能改善最小(屈伸 112.7°,伸展 13.6°,旋前 66.4°,旋后 71.4°)。任何组均未发生异位骨化或肱骨小头缺血性坏死。
通过分析骨折形态,对于伴有轻度至中度 LHC 粉碎的大部分 CF,可以采用比 PDHPWS 更简单、侵袭性更小且并发症更少的方法进行成功治疗。
IV 级;病例系列;治疗研究。