Institute of Bee Health, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Agroscope, Swiss Bee Research Centre, Bern, Switzerland.
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 13;10(1):4667. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61371-x.
Interactions between stressors are involved in the decline of wild species and losses of managed ones. Those interactions are often assumed to be synergistic, and per se of the same nature, even though susceptibility can vary within a single species. However, empirical measures of interaction effects across levels of susceptibility remain scarce. Here, we show clear evidence for extreme differences in stressor interactions ranging from antagonism to synergism within honeybees, Apis mellifera. While female honeybee workers exposed to both malnutrition and the pathogen Nosema ceranae showed synergistic interactions and increased stress, male drones showed antagonistic interactions and decreased stress. Most likely sex and division of labour in the social insects underlie these findings. It appears inevitable to empirically test the actual nature of stressor interactions across a range of susceptibility factors within a single species, before drawing general conclusions.
压力源之间的相互作用与野生物种的减少和受管理物种的损失有关。这些相互作用通常被认为是协同的,本质上是相同的,尽管在单一物种内易感性可能会有所不同。然而,在易感性的不同水平上衡量相互作用效应的经验性措施仍然很少。在这里,我们在蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)中显示出了明显的证据,证明了从拮抗到协同作用的压力源相互作用的极端差异。虽然同时暴露在营养不良和病原体中蜂蛹(Nosema ceranae)下的雌性工蜂表现出协同作用和增加的压力,但是雄性雄蜂表现出拮抗作用和减少的压力。最有可能的是,这些发现是由于社会昆虫中的性别和劳动分工所致。在得出一般性结论之前,有必要在单一物种内的一系列易感性因素范围内,对压力源相互作用的实际性质进行经验性测试。