Queensland Research Centre for Peripheral Vascular Disease College of Medicine and Dentistry James Cook University Townsville Queensland Australia.
The Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery Townsville University Hospital Townsville Queensland Australia.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 17;9(6):e015355. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015355. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
Background The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between serum lipoprotein (a) (Lp[a]) concentration and the requirement for peripheral artery disease (PAD) operations or incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. Methods and Results A total of 1472 people with PAD presenting with intermittent claudication (n=355), abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=989) or critical limb ischemia (n=128) were prospectively recruited from 4 outpatient clinics in Australia. Lp(a) was measured in serum samples collected at recruitment using an immunoassay. Participants were followed for a median (interquartile range) of 2.4 (0.1-6.1) years to record requirement for any PAD operation, defined to include any open or endovascular PAD intervention (lower limb peripheral revascularization, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, other aneurysm repair, or carotid artery revascularization). Myocardial infarctions, strokes, and deaths were also recorded. The association of Lp(a) with events was assessed using Cox proportional hazard analysis adjusting for traditional risk factors. Participants with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL had a greater requirement for any PAD operation (hazard ratio, 1.20, 95% CI, 1.02-1.41) and lower limb peripheral revascularization alone (hazard ratio 1.33, 95% CI, 1.06-1.66) but no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events or all-cause mortality. Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL and a 40 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) were also associated with an increased risk of lower limb peripheral revascularization alone but not with other outcomes. Conclusions In participants with PAD referred for hospital management those with high Lp(a) had greater requirement for lower limb peripheral revascularization but Lp(a) was not consistently associated with other clinical events.
背景 本研究旨在评估血清脂蛋白(a)(Lp[a])浓度与外周动脉疾病(PAD)手术需求或主要不良心血管事件发生率之间的关系。
方法和结果 本研究前瞻性地招募了来自澳大利亚 4 家门诊诊所的 1472 名患有间歇性跛行(n=355)、腹主动脉瘤(n=989)或严重肢体缺血(n=128)的 PAD 患者。在招募时使用免疫测定法测量血清样本中的 Lp(a)。中位(四分位间距)随访 2.4(0.1-6.1)年,以记录任何 PAD 手术的需求,定义为包括任何开放或血管内 PAD 干预(下肢外周血运重建、腹主动脉瘤修复、其他动脉瘤修复或颈动脉血运重建)。还记录了心肌梗死、中风和死亡。使用 Cox 比例风险分析评估 Lp(a)与事件的关联,调整了传统危险因素。Lp(a)≥30mg/dL 的患者需要进行任何 PAD 手术(风险比,1.20,95%CI,1.02-1.41)和下肢外周血运重建术(风险比,1.33,95%CI,1.06-1.66)的风险更高,但主要不良心血管事件或全因死亡率无增加风险。Lp(a)≥50mg/dL 和 Lp(a)增加 40mg/dL 也与单独下肢外周血运重建术的风险增加相关,但与其他结果无关。
结论 在因 PAD 就诊的患者中,Lp(a)水平较高的患者需要进行下肢外周血运重建术的可能性更大,但 Lp(a)与其他临床事件并不一致。