Kasahara Taku, Sakakura Kenichi, Yamamoto Kei, Taniguchi Yousuke, Tsukui Takunori, Seguchi Masaru, Wada Hiroshi, Momomura Shin-Ichi, Fujita Hideo
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University.
Int Heart J. 2020 Mar 28;61(2):209-214. doi: 10.1536/ihj.19-368. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
Recent guidelines do not recommend the routine use of intra-aortic balloon pumping (IABP) for patients with cardiogenic shock. However, IABP support is still selected for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in clinical practice because an Impella device did not show superiority over IABP and the mortality of AMI with cardiogenic shock is still high. This study aimed to find factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with AMI who required IABP support. Overall, 104 patients with AMI who required IABP support were included as the study population. Of 104 patients, in-hospital death was observed in 19 (18.3%). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to investigate the determinants of in-hospital death. Shock, resuscitation, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), pre-systolic blood pressure of IABP insertion, multi-vessel disease, fluoroscopy time, initial lactic acid dehydrogenase levels, and timing of IABP support were included as independent variables. Shock (OR 25.27, 95% CI 3.26-196.11, P = 0.002) was significantly associated with in-hospital death after controlling other covariates, whereas eGFR (every 10 mL/minute/1.73 m increase: OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.51-0.82, P < 0.001) and pre-percutaneous coronary intervention (pre-PCI) insertion of IABP (versus on-PCI insertion of IABP: OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.008-0.485, P = 0.008) were inversely associated with in-hospital death. In conclusion, shock was significantly associated with in-hospital death, whereas eGFR and pre-PCI insertion of IABP were inversely associated with in-hospital death in patients with AMI who received IABP support. Pre-PCI insertion of an IABP catheter might be associated with better survival in AMI patients who potentially require IABP support.
近期指南不建议对心源性休克患者常规使用主动脉内球囊反搏(IABP)。然而,在临床实践中,IABP支持仍被选用于急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者,因为Impella装置并未显示出优于IABP的效果,且AMI合并心源性休克的死亡率仍然很高。本研究旨在找出需要IABP支持的AMI患者院内死亡的相关因素。总体而言,104例需要IABP支持的AMI患者被纳入研究人群。在这104例患者中,19例(18.3%)出现院内死亡。进行多因素逐步逻辑回归分析以研究院内死亡的决定因素。休克、复苏情况、估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR)、IABP置入时的收缩压、多支血管病变、透视时间、初始乳酸脱氢酶水平以及IABP支持的时机作为自变量。在控制其他协变量后,休克(比值比[OR] 25.27,95%置信区间[CI] 3.26 - 196.11,P = 0.002)与院内死亡显著相关,而eGFR(每增加10 mL/分钟/1.73 m²:OR 0.65,95% CI 0.51 - 0.82,P < 0.001)和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)前置入IABP(与PCI时置入IABP相比:OR 0.06,95% CI 0.008 - 0.485,P = 0.008)与院内死亡呈负相关。总之,在接受IABP支持的AMI患者中,休克与院内死亡显著相关,而eGFR和PCI前置入IABP与院内死亡呈负相关。在可能需要IABP支持的AMI患者中,PCI前置入IABP导管可能与更好的生存率相关。