Yadav Gagandeep, Kandwal Pankaj, Arora Shobha S
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Mar 20;33(5):627-634. doi: 10.3171/2020.1.SPINE191152. Print 2020 Nov 1.
The authors sought to assess the outcomes of lamina-sparing decompression using a posterior-only approach in patients with thoracolumbar spinal tuberculosis (TB). In patients with spinal TB with paraplegia, anterior decompression yields excellent results because it allows direct access to the diseased part of the vertebra, but the anterior approach has related morbidities. Posterior and posterolateral decompression mitigate approach-related morbidities; however, these approaches destabilize the already diseased segment. Lamina-sparing decompression through a posterior-only approach is a modification of posterolateral and anterolateral decompression that allows simultaneous decompression and instrumentation while preserving the posterior healthy bony structure as much as possible.
Thirty-five patients with spinal TB underwent lamina-sparing decompression and instrumentation. Outcomes were determined by using a visual analog scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for functional assessment, the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) impairment grade for neurological assessment, blood loss and duration of surgery for surgical outcome assessment, and Cobb angles to measure kyphosis correction.
In total, 35 patients (12 men and 23 women) with an average age of 35.8 ± 18.7 (range 4-69) years underwent lamina-sparing decompression. Eight patients had dorsal, 7 had dorsolumbar, 7 had lumbar, 9 had multifocal contiguous, and 4 patients had multifocal noncontiguous spinal TB; 33 patients had paradiscal Pott's spine (tuberculous spondylodiscitis), and 2 had central-type disease. The average preoperative Cobb angle was 28.4° ± 14.9° (range 0°-60°) and the postoperative Cobb angle was 16.3° ± 11.3° (44° to -15°). There was loss of 1.6° ± 1.5° (0°-5°) during 16 months of follow-up. Average blood loss was 526 ± 316 (range 130-1200) ml. Duration of surgery was 228 ± 79.14 (range 60-320) minutes. Level of vertebral instrumentation on average was 0.97 ± 0.8 (range 0-4) vertebra proximal and 1.25 ± 0.75 (0-3) distal to the diseased segment. Neurological recovery during the immediate postoperative period occurred in 23 of 27 patients (85.1%). All patients had recovered at the final follow-up at 16 months. The preoperative ODI score improved from 76.4 ± 17.9 (range 32-100) to 6.74 ± 17.2 (0-60) at 16 months. The preoperative VAS score improved from 7.48 ± 1.16 (6-10) to 0.47 ± 1.94 (0-8). Surgical site infection occurred in 2 patients, and 1 patient had an intraoperative dural tear that was successfully repaired. One patient developed implant loosening at 3 months, which was managed by extended instrumentation.
To achieve stability, lamina-sparing decompression allows fixation of lower numbers of vertebrae proximal and distal to the diseased segment. This method has a fair outcome in terms of kyphosis correction, good functional and neurological recovery, shorter surgical duration than conventional methods, and less blood loss.
作者试图评估采用单纯后路椎板保留减压术治疗胸腰椎脊柱结核(TB)患者的疗效。对于合并截瘫的脊柱结核患者,前路减压效果良好,因为它能直接到达椎体病变部位,但前路手术存在相关并发症。后路和后外侧减压可减轻手术相关并发症;然而,这些方法会破坏已患病节段的稳定性。单纯后路椎板保留减压术是对后外侧和前外侧减压术的改良,可在尽可能保留后部健康骨质结构的同时实现减压和内固定。
35例脊柱结核患者接受了椎板保留减压术和内固定术。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)进行功能评估,采用美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤分级进行神经功能评估,通过失血量和手术时长评估手术效果,使用Cobb角测量后凸畸形矫正情况。
共有35例患者(12例男性和23例女性)接受了椎板保留减压术,平均年龄为35.8±18.7(4 - 69)岁。8例为胸椎结核,7例为胸腰段结核,7例为腰椎结核,9例为多节段连续型结核,4例为多节段非连续型结核;33例为椎间盘周围型结核性脊柱炎(结核性脊椎间盘炎),2例为中央型病变。术前平均Cobb角为28.4°±14.9°(0° - 60°),术后为16.3°±11.3°(44°至 - 15°)。随访16个月期间Cobb角丢失1.6°±1.5°(0° - 5°)。平均失血量为526±316(130 - 1200)ml。手术时长为228±79.14(60 - 320)分钟。病变节段近端平均固定0.97±0.8(0 - 4)个椎体,远端平均固定于1.25±0.75(0 - 3)个椎体。术后即刻27例患者中有23例(85.1%)神经功能恢复。所有患者在16个月的最终随访时均已恢复。术前ODI评分从76.4±17.9(32 - 100)改善至16个月时的6.74±17.2(0 - 60)。术前VAS评分从7.48±1.16(6 - 10)改善至0.47±1.94(0 - 8)。2例患者发生手术部位感染,1例患者术中硬脊膜撕裂,已成功修复。1例患者在3个月时出现植入物松动,通过延长内固定进行处理。
为实现稳定性,椎板保留减压术可减少病变节段近端和远端的固定椎体数量。该方法在矫正后凸畸形方面效果尚可,功能和神经功能恢复良好,手术时长比传统方法短,失血量少。