Buell Thomas J, Yener Ulas, Wang Tony R, Buchholz Avery L, Yen Chun-Po, Shaffrey Mark E, Shaffrey Christopher I, Smith Justin S
1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia; and.
2Department of Neurological Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2020 Mar 27;33(2):225-236. doi: 10.3171/2019.12.SPINE191148. Print 2020 Aug 1.
Sacral insufficiency fracture after lumbosacral (LS) arthrodesis is an uncommon complication. The objective of this study was to report the authors' operative experience managing this complication, review pertinent literature, and propose a treatment algorithm.
The authors analyzed consecutive adult patients treated at their institution from 2009 to 2018. Patients who underwent surgery for sacral insufficiency fractures after posterior instrumented LS arthrodesis were included. PubMed was queried to identify relevant articles detailing management of this complication.
Nine patients with a minimum 6-month follow-up were included (mean age 73 ± 6 years, BMI 30 ± 6 kg/m2, 56% women, mean follow-up 35 months, range 8-96 months). Six patients had osteopenia/osteoporosis (mean dual energy x-ray absorptiometry hip T-score -1.6 ± 0.5) and 3 received treatment. Index LS arthrodesis was performed for spinal stenosis (n = 6), proximal junctional kyphosis (n = 2), degenerative scoliosis (n = 1), and high-grade spondylolisthesis (n = 1). Presenting symptoms of back/leg pain (n = 9) or lower extremity weakness (n = 3) most commonly occurred within 4 weeks of index LS arthrodesis, which prompted CT for fracture diagnosis at a mean of 6 weeks postoperatively. All sacral fractures were adjacent or involved S1 screws and traversed the spinal canal (Denis zone III). H-, U-, or T-type sacral fracture morphology was identified in 7 patients. Most fractures (n = 8) were Roy-Camille type II (anterior displacement with kyphosis). All patients underwent lumbopelvic fixation via a posterior-only approach; mean operative duration and blood loss were 3.3 hours and 850 ml, respectively. Bilateral dual iliac screws were utilized in 8 patients. Back/leg pain and weakness improved postoperatively. Mean sacral fracture anterolisthesis and kyphotic angulation improved (from 8 mm/11° to 4 mm/5°, respectively) and all fractures were healed on radiographic follow-up (mean duration 29 months, range 8-90 months). Two patients underwent revision for rod fractures at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. A literature review found 17 studies describing 87 cases; potential risk factors were osteoporosis, longer fusions, high pelvic incidence (PI), and postoperative PI-to-lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch.
A high index of suspicion is needed to diagnose sacral insufficiency fracture after LS arthrodesis. A trial of conservative management is reasonable for select patients; potential surgical indications include refractory pain, neurological deficit, fracture nonunion with anterolisthesis or kyphotic angulation, L5-S1 pseudarthrosis, and spinopelvic malalignment. Lumbopelvic fixation with iliac screws may be effective salvage treatment to allow fracture healing and symptom improvement. High-risk patients may benefit from prophylactic lumbopelvic fixation at the time of index LS arthrodesis.
腰骶部(LS)关节融合术后发生的骶骨不全骨折是一种罕见的并发症。本研究的目的是报告作者处理该并发症的手术经验,回顾相关文献,并提出一种治疗方案。
作者分析了2009年至2018年在其机构接受治疗的连续成年患者。纳入在后路器械辅助LS关节融合术后因骶骨不全骨折接受手术的患者。检索PubMed以识别详细描述该并发症处理的相关文章。
纳入9例至少随访6个月的患者(平均年龄73±6岁,体重指数30±6kg/m²,56%为女性,平均随访35个月,范围8 - 96个月)。6例患者存在骨质减少/骨质疏松(平均双能X线吸收法髋部T值 -1.6±0.5),3例接受了治疗。初次LS关节融合术的原因包括腰椎管狭窄(n = 6)、近端交界性后凸(n = 2)、退变性脊柱侧凸(n = 1)和重度腰椎滑脱(n = 1)。腰/腿痛(n = 9)或下肢无力(n =
3)等主要症状最常出现在初次LS关节融合术后4周内,这促使在术后平均6周时进行CT检查以诊断骨折。所有骶骨骨折均邻近或累及S1螺钉并穿过椎管(Denis III区)。7例患者被确定为H型、U型或T型骶骨骨折形态。大多数骨折(n = 8)为Roy-Camille II型(伴有后凸的前移位)。所有患者均通过单纯后路进行腰骶部固定;平均手术时间和失血量分别为3.3小时和850ml。8例患者使用了双侧双髂螺钉。术后腰/腿痛和无力症状改善。平均骶骨骨折前滑脱和后凸角度改善(分别从8mm/11°改善至4mm/5°),并且在影像学随访时所有骨折均愈合(平均时间29个月,范围8 - 90个月)。2例患者分别在术后1年和2年因棒材断裂接受了翻修手术。文献回顾发现17项研究描述了87例病例;潜在危险因素包括骨质疏松、融合节段更长、骨盆入射角(PI)高以及术后PI与腰椎前凸(LL)不匹配。
诊断LS关节融合术后的骶骨不全骨折需要高度的怀疑指数。对于部分患者,试行保守治疗是合理的;潜在的手术指征包括顽固性疼痛、神经功能缺损、伴有前滑脱或后凸角度的骨折不愈合、L5 - S1假关节以及脊柱骨盆排列不齐。使用髂螺钉进行腰骶部固定可能是有效的挽救性治疗方法,可使骨折愈合并改善症状。高危患者可能在初次LS关节融合术时预防性腰骶部固定中获益。