Department of Psychiatry, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT.
Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2020 Aug 24;22(9):1446-1452. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa051.
Most people who smoke cigarettes are not willing (ie, not ready) to make a quit attempt (QA) at any given time. Unfortunately, interventions intended to increase QAs and the success of QAs are only modestly effective. Identifying processes leading to QAs and quitting success could guide intervention development.
This is a secondary analysis of a randomized factorial trial of 6 weeks of motivation-phase interventions among primary care patients (N = 517) who were initially unwilling to quit but were willing to reduce their smoking. Using logistic regression, we controlled for treatment condition and tested whether baseline or change in smoking-related constructs after 6 weeks of treatment predicted (1) making an at least 24 h QA between weeks 6 and 26 and (2) quitting success at week 26 (7-day point-prevalence abstinence among those who made a QA). Predictors included cigarettes/day, time to first cigarette, motivation to quit, quitting self-efficacy, anticipated urges to smoke if quit, positive affect, negative affect, and time spent around others who smoke.
In multivariable models that included all smoking-related constructs, changes in the following variables predicted initiating a QA above and beyond other variables: greater baseline time to first cigarette (odds ratio [OR] = 1.60), increases in time to first cigarette (OR = 1.27), and increases in quitting self-efficacy (OR = 1.14). Increased motivation to quit predicted conversion of a QA into quitting success at 26 weeks (OR = 1.36).
Predictors of making a QA differed from predictors of quitting success. Predictors of QAs and success could each serve as important treatment targets of motivation-phase interventions.
Motivation-phase interventions for people initially unwilling to quit smoking cigarettes may be improved by striving to increase their (1) time to first cigarette and quitting self-efficacy to promote QAs and (2) motivation to quit to promote quit success. Future experimental tests of such interventions are needed to identify causal determinants of QAs and quitting success.
大多数吸烟的人在任何特定时间都不愿意(即尚未准备好)尝试戒烟。不幸的是,旨在增加戒烟尝试和戒烟成功率的干预措施效果仅适度。确定导致戒烟尝试和戒烟成功的过程可以指导干预措施的制定。
这是一项针对初级保健患者(N=517)为期 6 周动机阶段干预的随机因子试验的二次分析,这些患者最初不愿意戒烟,但愿意减少吸烟量。使用逻辑回归,我们控制了治疗条件,并测试了 6 周治疗后与吸烟相关的结构的基线或变化是否预测了(1)在第 6 周到第 26 周之间进行至少 24 小时的戒烟尝试,以及(2)在第 26 周的戒烟成功率(在进行戒烟尝试的人中,7 天点患病率为戒断)。预测因子包括每天吸烟量、首次吸烟时间、戒烟动机、戒烟自我效能、戒烟时预计的吸烟冲动、积极情绪、消极情绪以及与吸烟者相处的时间。
在包含所有与吸烟相关的结构的多变量模型中,与其他变量相比,以下变量的变化预测了开始戒烟尝试:更大的基线首次吸烟时间(优势比[OR] = 1.60)、首次吸烟时间的增加(OR = 1.27)和戒烟自我效能的增加(OR = 1.14)。戒烟动机的增加预测了第 26 周戒烟尝试向戒烟成功的转变(OR = 1.36)。
戒烟尝试的预测因素与戒烟成功的预测因素不同。戒烟尝试和成功的预测因素都可以作为动机阶段干预的重要治疗目标。
对于最初不愿意戒烟的人来说,动机阶段的干预措施可能会通过努力增加他们的(1)首次吸烟时间和戒烟自我效能,以促进戒烟尝试,以及(2)戒烟动机,以促进戒烟成功,从而得到改善。需要进行进一步的实验测试,以确定戒烟尝试和戒烟成功的因果决定因素。