• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉觅食任务中注意力和眼动定向的动力学。

Dynamics of attentional and oculomotor orienting in visual foraging tasks.

机构信息

Icelandic Vision Laboratory, Faculty of Psychology, School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland.

School of Psychology, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):260-276. doi: 10.1177/1747021820919351. Epub 2020 May 24.

DOI:10.1177/1747021820919351
PMID:32238034
Abstract

A vast amount of research has been carried out to understand how humans visually search for targets in their environment. However, this research has typically involved search for one unique target among several distractors. Although this line of research has yielded important insights into the basic characteristics of how humans explore their visual environment, this may not be a very realistic model for everyday visual orientation. Recently, researchers have used multi-target displays to assess orienting in the visual field. Eye movements in such tasks are, however, less well understood. Here, we investigated oculomotor dynamics during four visual foraging tasks differing in target crypticity (feature-based foraging vs. conjunction-based foraging) and the effector type being used for target selection (mouse foraging vs. gaze foraging). Our results show that both target crypticity and effector type affect foraging strategies. These changes are reflected in oculomotor dynamics, feature foraging being associated with focal exploration (long fixations and short-amplitude saccades), and conjunction foraging with ambient exploration (short fixations and high-amplitude saccades). These results provide important new information for existing accounts of visual attention and oculomotor control and emphasise the usefulness of foraging tasks for a better understanding of how humans orient in the visual environment.

摘要

大量的研究已经进行,以了解人类如何在环境中寻找目标。然而,这项研究通常涉及在几个干扰项中寻找一个独特的目标。虽然这一系列的研究为人类如何探索视觉环境的基本特征提供了重要的见解,但这可能不是一种非常现实的日常视觉定位模型。最近,研究人员使用多目标显示器来评估视野中的定向。然而,在这种任务中,眼球运动的理解还不够充分。在这里,我们研究了在四种不同的视觉觅食任务中眼球运动的动力学,这些任务在目标隐藏性(基于特征的觅食与基于联合的觅食)和用于目标选择的效应器类型(鼠标觅食与凝视觅食)方面存在差异。我们的结果表明,目标隐藏性和效应器类型都影响觅食策略。这些变化反映在眼球运动动力学中,特征觅食与焦点探索(长注视和短振幅扫视)相关,而联合觅食与环境探索(短注视和高振幅扫视)相关。这些结果为现有的视觉注意和眼球运动控制理论提供了重要的新信息,并强调了觅食任务对于更好地理解人类如何在视觉环境中定向的有用性。

相似文献

1
Dynamics of attentional and oculomotor orienting in visual foraging tasks.视觉觅食任务中注意力和眼动定向的动力学。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2022 Feb;75(2):260-276. doi: 10.1177/1747021820919351. Epub 2020 May 24.
2
Dynamics of visual attention revealed in foraging tasks.视觉注意力在觅食任务中的动态变化。
Cognition. 2020 Jan;194:104032. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104032. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
3
The Functional Visual Field(s) in simple visual search.简单视觉搜索中的功能视场。
Vision Res. 2022 Jan;190:107965. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2021.107965. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
4
The selection balance: Contrasting value, proximity and priming in a multitarget foraging task.选择平衡:多目标觅食任务中的对比价值、接近度和启动效应。
Cognition. 2022 Jan;218:104935. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104935. Epub 2021 Oct 18.
5
Domain Specificity of Oculomotor Learning after Changes in Sensory Processing.感觉处理变化后动眼学习的领域特异性
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 22;37(47):11469-11484. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1208-17.2017. Epub 2017 Oct 20.
6
New insights into feature and conjunction search: I. Evidence from pupil size, eye movements and ageing.特征搜索和联合搜索的新见解:I. 来自瞳孔大小、眼动和年龄的证据。
Cortex. 2010 May;46(5):621-36. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.013. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
7
Gaze distractors influence saccadic curvature: evidence for the role of the oculomotor system in gaze-cued orienting.注视干扰物会影响扫视曲率:动眼系统在注视提示定向中作用的证据。
Vision Res. 2006 Oct;46(21):3674-80. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.06.004. Epub 2006 Aug 9.
8
Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.扫视语境指示视觉固视内的信息处理:来自相关事件电位和眼动分析的分心效应证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2011 Apr;80(1):54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.01.013. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
9
Influence of social presence on eye movements in visual search tasks.社交临场感对视觉搜索任务中眼动的影响。
Ergonomics. 2017 Dec;60(12):1667-1681. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2017.1342870. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.主动视觉搜索过程中眼动的引导
Vision Res. 1998 Jun;38(12):1805-15. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00349-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoding target discriminability and time pressure using eye and head movement features in a foraging search task.在觅食搜索任务中利用眼睛和头部运动特征解码目标可辨别性和时间压力。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2025 Aug 22;10(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s41235-025-00657-y.
2
Foraging through emotions: emotional stimuli and participants' trait anxiety shape visual foraging.探索情绪:情绪刺激与参与者的特质焦虑塑造视觉探索行为。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 May 21;12(5):242175. doi: 10.1098/rsos.242175. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Establishing gaze markers of perceptual load during multi-target visual search.
建立多目标视觉搜索过程中感知负荷的注视标记。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Aug 31;8(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00498-7.
4
A Bayesian Statistical Model Is Able to Predict Target-by-Target Selection Behaviour in a Human Foraging Task.贝叶斯统计模型能够预测人类觅食任务中逐个目标的选择行为。
Vision (Basel). 2022 Nov 11;6(4):66. doi: 10.3390/vision6040066.
5
Foraging as sampling without replacement: A Bayesian statistical model for estimating biases in target selection.无替换采样觅食:一种用于估计目标选择偏差的贝叶斯统计模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Jan 24;18(1):e1009813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009813. eCollection 2022 Jan.
6
Search strategies improve with practice, but not with time pressure or financial incentives.搜索策略随着实践而提高,但不会随着时间压力或经济激励而提高。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Jul;47(7):1009-1021. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000912.
7
The Predation Game: Does dividing attention affect patterns of human foraging?捕食游戏:分散注意力是否会影响人类觅食模式?
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 May 6;6(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00299-w.
8
Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.保持真实:超越视觉认知的能力极限。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1375-1390. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02256-7. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
9
Eating disorder symptoms and foraging for food related items.饮食失调症状与搜寻食物相关物品。
J Eat Disord. 2021 Feb 10;9(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40337-021-00373-0.