Suppr超能文献

一种不使用手动工具的新型全压电技术用于第三磨牙牙根拔除的临床疗效:一项临床随机对照研究

Clinical efficacy of a new fully piezoelectric technique for third molar root extraction without using manual tools: a clinical randomized controlled study.

作者信息

Fabrizio Fontanella, Grusovin Maria Gabriella, Gavatta Monica, Vercellotti Tomaso

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2020;51(5):406-414. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44370.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate the efficacy of a new technique fully based on the use of a piezoelectric device for third molar root extraction versus the conventional technique based on the use of manual and rotary instruments.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Patients referred to the hospital of Bolzano for third molar extraction were randomly divided into two groups and treated by two experienced oral surgeons. In the test group all the procedures were performed using piezoelectric instruments and a specially designed piezoelectric lever, whereas in the control group conventional manual and rotary instruments were used. The main outcome measure was patient's pain perception, and the secondary outcome measures were complications, duration of the surgical treatment, and soft tissue healing. The study had a 1-week follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty patients (23 females and 27 males) out of 90 were included in the study, and 100 third molars (50 maxillary and 50 mandibular) were extracted. All patients completed the expected follow-up. No differences were found between the two groups regarding patient's pain perception, complications, and soft tissue healing. However, the new piezoelectric extraction technique took less than half the time when compared to the conventional technique (4.6 ± 4.5 minutes versus 10.2 ± 13.1 minutes; P = .049).

CONCLUSIONS

The new piezoelectric third molar root extraction technique allowed third molar extraction in less than one half the surgical time required by the traditional technique. The advantages seem to be more pronounced in difficult cases. However, both surgeons who performed the procedures were very experienced and all the patients were young. Therefore, caution should be given to the generalization of the results. Multicenter studies with a larger variety of patients are needed to confirm the promising results of this study.

摘要

目的

本随机对照临床研究旨在评估一种完全基于使用压电装置进行第三磨牙牙根拔除的新技术与基于使用手动和旋转器械的传统技术的疗效。

方法与材料

转诊至博尔扎诺医院进行第三磨牙拔除的患者被随机分为两组,由两位经验丰富的口腔外科医生进行治疗。试验组所有操作均使用压电器械和一种专门设计的压电杠杆,而对照组使用传统的手动和旋转器械。主要观察指标为患者的疼痛感知,次要观察指标为并发症、手术治疗持续时间和软组织愈合情况。该研究进行了为期1周的随访。

结果

90名患者中有50名(23名女性和27名男性)被纳入研究,共拔除了100颗第三磨牙(50颗上颌牙和50颗下颌牙)。所有患者均完成了预期的随访。两组在患者疼痛感知、并发症和软组织愈合方面未发现差异。然而,与传统技术相比,新的压电拔除技术所需时间不到其一半(4.6±4.5分钟对10.2±13.1分钟;P = 0.049)。

结论

新压电第三磨牙牙根拔除技术使第三磨牙拔除的手术时间不到传统技术所需时间的一半。在困难病例中优势似乎更为明显。然而,进行手术的两位外科医生都非常有经验,且所有患者都很年轻。因此,应谨慎推广这些结果。需要进行多中心研究,纳入更多样化患者以证实本研究的良好结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验