Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (LPNC), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Grenoble Alpes.
Department of Experimental Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University.
Psychol Sci. 2020 May;31(5):488-504. doi: 10.1177/0956797619900336. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
Previous studies have suggested that action constraints influence visual perception of distances. For instance, the greater the effort to cover a distance, the longer people perceive this distance to be. The present multilevel Bayesian meta-analysis (37 studies with 1,035 total participants) supported the existence of a small action-constraint effect on distance estimation, Hedges's = 0.29, 95% credible interval = [0.16, 0.47]. This effect varied slightly according to the action-constraint category (effort, weight, tool use) but not according to participants' motor intention. Some authors have argued that such effects reflect experimental demand biases rather than genuine perceptual effects. Our meta-analysis did not allow us to dismiss this possibility, but it also did not support it. We provide field-specific conventions for interpreting action-constraint effect sizes and the minimum sample sizes required to detect them with various levels of power. We encourage researchers to help us update this meta-analysis by directly uploading their published or unpublished data to our online repository ( https://osf.io/bc3wn/ ).
先前的研究表明,动作约束会影响人们对距离的视觉感知。例如,人们感觉移动一段距离所需的力越大,这段距离就会显得越长。本多层次贝叶斯元分析(37 项研究,共 1035 名参与者)支持在距离估计中存在一个较小的动作约束效应,Hedges'g = 0.29,95%可信区间为[0.16, 0.47]。该效应根据动作约束类别(努力、重量、工具使用)略有不同,但与参与者的运动意图无关。一些作者认为,这些影响反映的是实验需求偏差,而不是真正的感知效应。我们的元分析不能排除这种可能性,但也没有支持这种可能性。我们提供了特定领域的约定,用于解释动作约束效应大小以及以不同的功效水平检测它们所需的最小样本量。我们鼓励研究人员通过直接将他们已发表或未发表的数据上传到我们的在线存储库(https://osf.io/bc3wn/)来帮助我们更新此元分析。