Blake Sarah R, Shahzad Adeel, Kemp Ian, Mars Christine, Wilson Keith, Stables Rod H
Institute of Cardiovascular Medicine and Science, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital, Thomas Drive, Liverpool L14 3PE, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Southmoor Rd, Wythenshawe, Manchester M23 9LT, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Jul 1;310:37-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2020.03.065. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
There is ongoing uncertainty regarding the safety and efficacy of unfractionated heparin and bivalirudin when used for systemic anticoagulation in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). This paper reports 12-month mortality from the HEAT-PPCI randomised trial.
In this open-label, randomised controlled trial (RCT) we enrolled consecutive adults with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Patients were randomised to heparin (bolus 70 U/kg) or bivalirudin (bolus 0.75 mg/kg followed by an infusion 1.75 mg/kg/h for the duration of the procedure). We report the pre-specified secondary outcome of all-cause mortality at 12 months. Mortality was classified as cardiovascular or not, blinded to treatment allocation. Deaths in the first 28 days were classified by formal event adjudication and later events classified from death certificates.
Mortality status at 12 months was obtained for 1805/1812 = 99.6% of participants. Overall mortality was 160/1812 = 8.9%. There were more deaths in those randomised to bivalirudin (95/902 = 10.5% vs 65/903 = 7.2%; HR 1.48; 95% CI 1.08 to 2.03; p = 0.015). Most deaths were classified as cardiovascular (71/902 = 7.9% in the bivalirudin group and 53/904 = 5.9% in the heparin group). The difference between the rates of cardiovascular deaths in each treatment group did not reach statistical significance: HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.93; p = 0.095.
At 12 months, treatment with bivalirudin, rather than heparin, was associated with a higher rate of all-cause mortality. Cardiovascular mortality was higher with bivalirudin although this difference was not statistically significant.
对于普通肝素和比伐卢定在接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)的患者中用于全身抗凝时的安全性和有效性,目前仍存在不确定性。本文报告了HEAT-PPCI随机试验的12个月死亡率。
在这项开放标签的随机对照试验(RCT)中,我们纳入了连续的疑似ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的成年人。患者被随机分为肝素组(静脉推注70 U/kg)或比伐卢定组(静脉推注0.75 mg/kg,随后在手术期间以1.75 mg/kg/h的速度静脉滴注)。我们报告了预先设定的12个月全因死亡率这一次要结局。死亡率被分类为心血管原因导致的或非心血管原因导致的,对治疗分配情况设盲。前28天内的死亡通过正式的事件判定进行分类,后期事件根据死亡证明进行分类。
1812名参与者中有1805名(99.6%)获得了12个月时的死亡状态。总体死亡率为160/1812 = 8.9%。随机分配到比伐卢定组的患者死亡人数更多(95/902 = 10.5% 对比65/903 = 7.2%;风险比1.48;95%置信区间1.08至2.03;p = 0.015)。大多数死亡被分类为心血管原因导致的(比伐卢定组71/902 = 7.9%,肝素组53/904 = 5.9%)。各治疗组中心血管死亡发生率之间的差异未达到统计学显著性:风险比1.35;95%置信区间0.95至1.93;p = 0.095。
在12个月时,使用比伐卢定而非肝素治疗与更高的全因死亡率相关。比伐卢定组的心血管死亡率更高,尽管这一差异无统计学显著性。