Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
J Virol. 2020 Jun 16;94(13). doi: 10.1128/JVI.00335-20.
Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is a leading cause of infectious blindness, highlighting the need for effective vaccines. A single-cycle HSV-2 strain with the deletion of glycoprotein D, ΔgD-2, completely protected mice from HSV-1 and HSV-2 skin or vaginal disease and prevented latency following active or passive immunization in preclinical studies. The antibodies functioned primarily by activating Fc receptors to mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). The ability of ADCC to protect the immune-privileged eye, however, may differ from skin or vaginal infections. Thus, the current studies were designed to compare active and passive immunization with ΔgD-2 versus an adjuvanted gD subunit vaccine (rgD-2) in a primary lethal ocular murine model. ΔgD-2 provided significantly greater protection than rgD-2 following a two-dose vaccine regimen, although both vaccines were protective compared to an uninfected cell lysate. However, only immune serum from ΔgD-2-vaccinated, but not rgD-2-vaccinated, mice provided significant protection against lethality in passive transfer studies. The significantly greater passive protection afforded by ΔgD-2 persisted after controlling for the total amount of HSV-specific IgG in the transferred serum. The antibodies elicited by rgD-2 had significantly higher neutralizing titers, whereas those elicited by ΔgD-2 had significantly more C1q binding and Fc gamma receptor activation, a surrogate for ADCC function. Together, the findings suggest ADCC is protective in the eye and that nonneutralizing antibodies elicited by ΔgD-2 provide greater protection than neutralizing antibodies elicited by rgD-2 against primary ocular HSV disease. The findings support advancement of vaccines, including ΔgD-2, that elicit polyfunctional antibody responses. Herpes simplex virus 1 is the leading cause of infectious corneal blindness in the United States and Europe. Developing vaccines to prevent ocular disease is challenging because the eye is a relatively immune-privileged site. In this study, we compared a single-cycle viral vaccine candidate, which is unique in that it elicits predominantly nonneutralizing antibodies that activate Fc receptors and bind complement, and a glycoprotein D subunit vaccine that elicits neutralizing but not Fc receptor-activating or complement-binding responses. Only the single-cycle vaccine provided both active and passive protection against a lethal ocular challenge. These findings greatly expand our understanding of the types of immune responses needed to protect the eye and will inform future prophylactic and therapeutic strategies.
单纯疱疹病毒 1(HSV-1)是传染性失明的主要原因,这凸显了对有效疫苗的需求。在临床前研究中,缺失糖蛋白 D 的单周期 HSV-2 株,ΔgD-2,完全保护小鼠免受 HSV-1 和 HSV-2 皮肤或阴道疾病的侵害,并防止潜伏性感染,无论是主动免疫还是被动免疫。这些抗体主要通过激活 Fc 受体来介导抗体依赖性细胞毒性(ADCC)。然而,ADCC 保护免疫特权眼睛的能力可能与皮肤或阴道感染不同。因此,本研究旨在比较主动和被动免疫接种ΔgD-2与佐剂糖蛋白 D 亚单位疫苗(rgD-2)在原发性致死性眼部小鼠模型中的效果。与未感染的细胞裂解物相比,尽管两种疫苗都具有保护作用,但与 rgD-2 相比,ΔgD-2 在两剂疫苗方案后提供了更大的保护。然而,只有来自 ΔgD-2 疫苗接种的免疫血清,而不是 rgD-2 疫苗接种的免疫血清,在被动转移研究中提供了对致死性的显著保护。在控制转移血清中 HSV 特异性 IgG 总量后,ΔgD-2 提供的显著更大的被动保护仍然存在。rgD-2 诱导的抗体具有显著更高的中和滴度,而 ΔgD-2 诱导的抗体具有显著更多的 C1q 结合和 Fcγ 受体激活,这是 ADCC 功能的替代物。总之,这些发现表明 ADCC 在眼睛中具有保护作用,并且与 rgD-2 诱导的中和抗体相比,ΔgD-2 诱导的非中和抗体对原发性眼部 HSV 疾病提供更大的保护。这些发现支持推进疫苗的发展,包括ΔgD-2,它能引发多效性抗体反应。单纯疱疹病毒 1 是美国和欧洲传染性角膜盲的主要原因。开发预防眼部疾病的疫苗具有挑战性,因为眼睛是一个相对免疫特权的部位。在这项研究中,我们比较了一种单周期病毒疫苗候选物,它的独特之处在于它主要诱导非中和抗体,这些抗体能激活 Fc 受体并结合补体,以及一种糖蛋白 D 亚单位疫苗,它能诱导中和但不能诱导 Fc 受体激活或补体结合反应。只有单周期疫苗能对致命性眼部挑战提供主动和被动保护。这些发现极大地扩展了我们对保护眼睛所需免疫反应类型的理解,并将为未来的预防性和治疗性策略提供信息。