• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体在信任评价上的差异主要是由环境而不是基因塑造的。

Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes.

机构信息

Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia;

School of Psychology, King's College, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, Scotland.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10218-10224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920131117. Epub 2020 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1920131117
PMID:32341163
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7229747/
Abstract

People evaluate a stranger's trustworthiness from their facial features in a fraction of a second, despite common advice "not to judge a book by its cover." Evaluations of trustworthiness have critical and widespread social impact, predicting financial lending, mate selection, and even criminal justice outcomes. Consequently, understanding how people perceive trustworthiness from faces has been a major focus of scientific inquiry, and detailed models explain how consensus impressions of trustworthiness are driven by facial attributes. However, facial impression models do not consider variation between observers. Here, we develop a sensitive test of trustworthiness evaluation and use it to document substantial, stable individual differences in trustworthiness impressions. Via a twin study, we show that these individual differences are largely shaped by variation in personal experience, rather than genes or shared environments. Finally, using multivariate twin modeling, we show that variation in trustworthiness evaluation is specific, dissociating from other key facial evaluations of dominance and attractiveness. Our finding that variation in facial trustworthiness evaluation is driven mostly by personal experience represents a rare example of a core social perceptual capacity being predominantly shaped by a person's unique environment. Notably, it stands in sharp contrast to variation in facial recognition ability, which is driven mostly by genes. Our study provides insights into the development of the social brain, offers a different perspective on disagreement in trust in wider society, and motivates new research into the origins and potential malleability of face evaluation, a critical aspect of human social cognition.

摘要

尽管有“不要以貌取人”的普遍建议,但人们会在一瞬间通过面部特征来评估陌生人的可信度。可信度的评估对社会具有重要而广泛的影响,它可以预测金融借贷、伴侣选择,甚至刑事司法结果。因此,了解人们如何通过面部来感知可信度一直是科学研究的重点,详细的模型解释了信任印象是如何受到面部特征的驱动。然而,面部印象模型并没有考虑到观察者之间的差异。在这里,我们开发了一种对可信度评估的敏感测试,并利用它来记录可信度印象中存在的大量、稳定的个体差异。通过一项双胞胎研究,我们表明这些个体差异主要是由个人经历的变化塑造的,而不是由基因或共同环境决定的。最后,通过多元双胞胎模型分析,我们发现可信度评估的变化是特定的,与其他关键的面部评估(如支配力和吸引力)是分离的。我们的发现表明,面部可信度评估的变化主要是由个人经历驱动的,这代表了一种罕见的情况,即核心社会感知能力主要是由一个人的独特环境塑造的。值得注意的是,这与面部识别能力的变化形成鲜明对比,后者主要是由基因驱动的。我们的研究为社会大脑的发展提供了新的见解,为更广泛的社会中对信任的分歧提供了新的视角,并激发了对脸的评价的起源和潜在可塑性的研究,这是人类社会认知的一个关键方面。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/c3225f96499a/pnas.1920131117fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/71b436a3682f/pnas.1920131117fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/061ac30773ae/pnas.1920131117fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/c3225f96499a/pnas.1920131117fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/71b436a3682f/pnas.1920131117fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/061ac30773ae/pnas.1920131117fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebe0/7229747/c3225f96499a/pnas.1920131117fig03.jpg

相似文献

1
Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes.个体在信任评价上的差异主要是由环境而不是基因塑造的。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 May 12;117(19):10218-10224. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1920131117. Epub 2020 Apr 27.
2
Three's a crowd: Fast ensemble perception of first impressions of trustworthiness.三人成众:快速整体感知第一印象的可信度。
Cognition. 2023 Oct;239:105540. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105540. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
3
CHILDREN'S AND ADULTS' JUDGMENTS OF FACIAL TRUSTWORTHINESS: THE RELATIONSHIP TO FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS.儿童与成人对面部可信度的判断:与面部吸引力的关系。
Percept Mot Skills. 2015 Aug;121(1):179-98. doi: 10.2466/27.22.PMS.121c10x1. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
4
Integrating social and facial models of person perception: Converging and diverging dimensions.整合人际知觉的社会与面部模型:趋同与分歧维度
Cognition. 2016 Dec;157:257-267. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
5
Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces.内隐偏见和经验会影响对异族面孔的整体但不是相对的可信度判断。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66705-7.
6
From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces.从可能到可爱:统计典型性在人类对面部社会评价中的作用。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29371-29380. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912343117.
7
The influence of subtle facial expressions on children's first impressions of trustworthiness and dominance is not adult-like.微妙的面部表情对儿童的可信度和支配力第一印象的影响不像成年人那样。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Apr;180:19-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
8
Do I trust you when you smile? Effects of sex and emotional expression on facial trustworthiness appraisal.当你微笑时,我是否信任你?性别和情感表达对面部可信度评价的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243230. eCollection 2020.
9
Judging trustworthiness from faces: Emotion cues modulate trustworthiness judgments in young children.从面部判断可信度:情绪线索调节幼儿对可信度的判断。
Br J Psychol. 2016 Aug;107(3):503-18. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12156. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
10
Do we spontaneously form stable trustworthiness impressions from facial appearance?我们是否会自发地对面部外观形成稳定的可信赖印象?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov;111(5):655-664. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000062.

引用本文的文献

1
Network models reveal high-dimensional social inferences in naturalistic settings beyond latent construct models.网络模型揭示了超越潜在结构模型的自然环境中的高维社会推理。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Jul 7;3(1):98. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00275-w.
2
Face evaluation: Findings, methods, and challenges.面部评估:研究结果、方法与挑战。
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2025 Mar;1545(1):28-37. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15293. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
When being unattractive is an advantage: effects of face perception on intuitive culpability judgments.当长相不出众成为一种优势:面部感知对直觉性罪责判断的影响

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying idiosyncratic and shared contributions to judgment.量化判断的个体差异和共同贡献。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Aug;52(4):1428-1444. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01323-0.
2
Do facial first impressions reflect a shared social reality?面部第一印象是否反映了共同的社会现实?
Br J Psychol. 2020 May;111(2):215-232. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12390. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
3
Stimulus generalization as a mechanism for learning to trust.刺激泛化作为学习信任的一种机制。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2024 Jan 8;31(6):1114-1130. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2023.2260847. eCollection 2024.
4
Talking body: the effect of body and voice anthropomorphism on perception of social agents.具身交流:身体与声音拟人化对社会行为体认知的影响
Front Robot AI. 2024 Oct 9;11:1456613. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1456613. eCollection 2024.
5
Implicit bias and experience influence overall but not relative trustworthiness judgment of other-race faces.内隐偏见和经验会影响对异族面孔的整体但不是相对的可信度判断。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 11;14(1):16068. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-66705-7.
6
Genetic effects on variability in visual aesthetic evaluations are partially shared across visual domains.遗传因素对视觉审美评价变异性的影响在一定程度上是跨视觉领域共享的。
Commun Biol. 2024 Jan 6;7(1):55. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05710-4.
7
Multimodal investigations of emotional face processing and social trait judgment of faces.多模态情感面孔加工和面孔社会特质判断的研究
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2024 Jan;1531(1):29-48. doi: 10.1111/nyas.15084. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
8
Effects of masculinity vs. femininity on competence judgement of politician faces and election outcome prediction.男性气质与女性气质对政客面孔的能力判断和选举结果预测的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 6;13(1):16825. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44159-7.
9
Comprehensive Social Trait Judgments From Faces in Autism Spectrum Disorder.自闭症谱系障碍患者的面部综合社会特质判断
Psychol Sci. 2023 Oct;34(10):1121-1145. doi: 10.1177/09567976231192236. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
10
Modeling facial perception in group context from a serial perception perspective.从连续感知的角度对群体情境中的面部感知进行建模。
J Vis. 2023 Mar 1;23(3):4. doi: 10.1167/jov.23.3.4.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Feb 13;115(7):E1690-E1697. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1715227115. Epub 2018 Jan 29.
4
Facial First Impressions Across Culture: Data-Driven Modeling of Chinese and British Perceivers' Unconstrained Facial Impressions.跨文化的面部第一印象:中国和英国观察者无约束面部印象的数据分析模型。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Apr;44(4):521-537. doi: 10.1177/0146167217744194. Epub 2017 Dec 10.
5
The unique contributions of perceiver and target characteristics in person perception.知觉者和目标特征在人际知觉中的独特贡献。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2017 Oct;113(4):513-529. doi: 10.1037/pspa0000090. Epub 2017 May 8.
6
Facial first impressions from another angle: How social judgements are influenced by changeable and invariant facial properties.从另一个角度看面部第一印象:社会判断如何受到可变和不变面部特征的影响。
Br J Psychol. 2017 May;108(2):397-415. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12206. Epub 2016 Jul 22.
7
Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.个体对面部的审美偏好主要由环境而非基因塑造。
Curr Biol. 2015 Oct 19;25(20):2684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.048. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
8
Genetic specificity of face recognition.人脸识别的基因特异性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Oct 13;112(41):12887-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1421881112. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
The Unique and Shared Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Fear, Anger, and Sadness in Childhood.童年时期恐惧、愤怒和悲伤的独特及共同的遗传与环境因素
Child Dev. 2015 Sep-Oct;86(5):1538-56. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12394. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
10
Facial Trustworthiness Predicts Extreme Criminal-Sentencing Outcomes.面部可信度可预测极端刑事量刑结果。
Psychol Sci. 2015 Aug;26(8):1325-31. doi: 10.1177/0956797615590992. Epub 2015 Jul 10.