Knapik Derrick M, Kolaczko Jensen G, Gillespie Robert J, Salata Michael J, Voos James E
Sports Medicine Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2020 Apr 20;8(4):2325967120911361. doi: 10.1177/2325967120911361. eCollection 2020 Apr.
Superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) tears are one of the most common injuries to the shoulder, with the type II variant representing the most frequently encountered subtype.
To systematically review the literature to better understand outcomes after arthroscopic repair of isolated type II SLAP lesions using knotted versus knotless anchors based on implant number, implant location, patient position, and portal position.
Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.
A systematic review investigating all studies in the literature between January 2000 and June 2019 reporting on patients undergoing arthroscopic repair for isolated type II SLAP lesions using knotted versus knotless suture anchors was performed following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines using the PubMed, BIOSIS Previews, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and Embase databases.
A total of 234 patients undergoing isolated arthroscopic repair of type II SLAP lesions using suture anchors were identified, with 76% (179/234) treated using knotted anchors versus 24% (55/234) treated using knotless anchors. Complications were reported in 12% of patients treated using knotted anchors versus no patients treated using knotless anchors ( = .008). The incidence of complications for knotted anchor repair was not significantly affected by patient position ( = .22) or portal position ( = .19). Using multiple regression analysis, we found no significant association with the incidence of complications when analyzing for anchor design ( = 0.02; = .06) or anchor position ( = 0.02; = .92). No significant difference in return-to-activity timing was appreciated based on anchor type ( = .28), patient position ( = .98), or portal position ( = .97) in patients treated using knotted anchors.
Patients treated using knotted anchors were significantly more likely to experience a postoperative complication compared with patients treated using knotless anchors after arthroscopic repair of isolated type II SLAP lesions. Despite the increased incidence of a postoperative complication after knotted anchor fixation compared with knotless anchor fixation, multiple regression analysis showed that anchor design and anchor position were not significantly predictive of the incidence of complications. Given the increasing popularity of knotless anchor fixation, further study on the long-term outcomes after knotless repair for isolated type II SLAP lesions is warranted.
上盂唇前后向(SLAP)撕裂是肩部最常见的损伤之一,其中II型变异是最常见的亚型。
系统回顾文献,以便根据植入物数量、植入物位置、患者体位和入路位置,更好地了解使用带结与不带结锚钉对孤立性II型SLAP损伤进行关节镜修复后的疗效。
系统回顾;证据等级,4级。
按照PRISMA(系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目)指南,使用PubMed、BIOSIS Previews、SPORTDiscus、PEDro和Embase数据库,对2000年1月至2019年6月间文献中所有报道使用带结与不带结缝线锚钉对孤立性II型SLAP损伤进行关节镜修复患者的研究进行系统回顾。
共确定234例使用缝线锚钉对孤立性II型SLAP损伤进行关节镜修复的患者,其中76%(179/234)使用带结锚钉治疗,24%(55/234)使用不带结锚钉治疗。使用带结锚钉治疗的患者中有12%报告出现并发症,而使用不带结锚钉治疗的患者未出现并发症(P = 0.008)。带结锚钉修复的并发症发生率不受患者体位(P = 0.22)或入路位置(P = 0.19)的显著影响。通过多元回归分析,我们发现在分析锚钉设计(P = 0.02;95%CI = 0.06)或锚钉位置(P = 0.02;95%CI = 0.92)时,与并发症发生率无显著相关性。在使用带结锚钉治疗的患者中,根据锚钉类型(P = 0.28)、患者体位(P = 0.98)或入路位置(P = 0.97),在恢复活动时间方面未发现显著差异。
在对孤立性II型SLAP损伤进行关节镜修复后,与使用不带结锚钉治疗的患者相比,使用带结锚钉治疗的患者术后发生并发症的可能性显著更高。尽管与不带结锚钉固定相比,带结锚钉固定术后并发症发生率增加,但多元回归分析表明,锚钉设计和锚钉位置对并发症发生率无显著预测作用。鉴于不带结锚钉固定的应用日益广泛,有必要对孤立性II型SLAP损伤进行不带结修复后的长期疗效进行进一步研究。