Suppr超能文献

急性呼吸窘迫综合征、呼气流量受限和气道关闭患者的肺和胸壁力学。

Lung and chest wall mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, expiratory flow limitation, and airway closure.

机构信息

Medecine Intensive-Réanimation, Groupement Hospitalier Centre, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

Université de Lyon, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2020 Jun 1;128(6):1594-1603. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00059.2020. Epub 2020 Apr 30.

Abstract

Tidal expiratory flow limitation (EFL), which may herald airway closure (AC), is a mechanism of loss of aeration in ARDS. In this prospective, short-term, two-center study, we measured static and dynamic chest wall (Est,cw and Edyn,cw) and lung (Est,L and Edyn,L) elastance with esophageal pressure, EFL, and AC at 5 cmHO positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in intubated, sedated, and paralyzed ARDS patients. For EFL determination, we used the atmospheric method and a new device allowing comparison of tidal flow during expiration to PEEP and to atmosphere. AC was validated when airway opening pressure (AOP) assessed from volume-pressure curve was found greater than PEEP by at least 1 cmHO. EFL was defined whenever flow did not increase between exhalation to PEEP and to atmosphere over all or part of expiration. Elastance values were expressed as percentage of normal predicted values (%N). Among the 25 patients included, eight had EFL (32%) and 13 AOP (52%). Between patients with and without EFL Edyn,cw [median (1st to 3rd quartiles)] was 70 (16-127) and 102 (70-142) %N ( = 0.32) and Edyn,L338 (332-763) and 224 (160-275) %N ( < 0.001). The corresponding values for Est,cw and Est,L were 70 (56-88) and 85 (64-103) %N ( = 0.35) and 248 (206-348) and 170 (144-195) ( = 0.02), respectively. Dynamic E had an area receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.88 [95% confidence intervals 0.83-0.92] for EFL and 0.74[0.68-0.79] for AOP. Higher Edyn,L was accurate to predict EFL in ARDS patients; AC can occur independently of EFL, and both should be assessed concurrently in ARDS patients. Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) and airway closure (AC) were observed in 32% and 52%, respectively, of 25 patients with ARDS investigated during mechanical ventilation in supine position with a positive end-expiratory pressure of 5 cmHO. The performance of dynamic lung elastance to detect expiratory flow limitation was good and better than that to detect airway closure. The vast majority of patients with EFL also had AC; however, AC can occur in the absence of EFL.

摘要

潮式呼吸气流受限(EFL),可能预示着气道关闭(AC),是 ARDS 中通气丧失的机制。在这项前瞻性、短期、双中心研究中,我们在机械通气下,使用食管压力测量了仰卧位 ARDS 患者在 5cmH2O 呼气末正压(PEEP)时的静态和动态胸壁(Est,cw 和 Edyn,cw)和肺(Est,L 和 Edyn,L)弹性,同时测量了 EFL 和 AC。为了确定 EFL,我们使用了大气方法和一种新的装置,该装置允许比较呼气过程中的潮式流量与 PEEP 和大气。当从体积-压力曲线评估气道开口压力(AOP)时,发现 AOP 至少比 PEEP 大 1cmHO 时,即可验证 AC。当在整个呼气或部分呼气过程中,呼气流速没有在呼气到 PEEP 和到大气之间增加时,就会定义 EFL。弹性值以正常预测值的百分比(%N)表示。在纳入的 25 名患者中,有 8 名患者出现 EFL(32%),13 名患者出现 AOP(52%)。在有和没有 EFL 的患者之间,Edyn,cw[中位数(1 至 3 四分位数)]分别为 70(16-127)和 102(70-142)%N(=0.32)和 Edyn,L338(332-763)和 224(160-275)%N(<0.001)。相应的 Est,cw 和 Est,L 值分别为 70(56-88)和 85(64-103)%N(=0.35)和 248(206-348)和 170(144-195)(=0.02)。动态 E 的 EFL 和 AOP 的面积接收者操作特征曲线分别为 0.88[95%置信区间 0.83-0.92]和 0.74[0.68-0.79]。在 ARDS 患者中,较高的 Edyn,L 能够准确预测 EFL;AC 可以独立于 EFL 发生,并且在 ARDS 患者中应同时评估两者。在接受机械通气的仰卧位 5cmH2O 呼气末正压的 25 名 ARDS 患者中,分别观察到 32%和 52%的患者存在 EFL 和 AC。动态肺弹性检测呼气受限的性能良好,优于检测气道关闭。大多数存在 EFL 的患者也存在 AC;然而,AC 也可能发生在没有 EFL 的情况下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验