Craney Arryn R, Velu Priya D, Satlin Michael J, Fauntleroy Kathy A, Callan Katrina, Robertson Amy, La Spina Marisa, Lei Beryl, Chen Anqi, Alston Tricia, Rozman Anna, Loda Massimo, Rennert Hanna, Cushing Melissa, Westblade Lars F
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Jul 23;58(8). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00890-20.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has emerged as the cause of a worldwide pandemic. Many commercial SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) assays have received Emergency Use Authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, there are limited data describing their performance, in particular the performance of high-throughput SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR systems. We analyzed the diagnostic performance of two high-throughput systems: cobas 6800 and Panther Fusion, and their associated RT-PCR assays, with a collection of 389 nasopharyngeal specimens. The overall agreement between the platforms was 96.4% (375/389). Cohen's kappa analysis rated the strength of agreement between the two platforms as "almost perfect" (κ = 0.922; standard error, 0.051). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between corresponding cycle threshold values generated on the two systems ( value = 0.88; Student's test). Taken together, these data imply that the two platforms can be considered comparable in terms of their clinical performance. We believe that this information will be useful for those who have already adopted these platforms or are seeking to implement high-throughput RT-PCR testing to stem the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)已成为全球大流行的病因。许多商业性SARS-CoV-2逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测方法已获得美国食品药品监督管理局的紧急使用授权。然而,描述其性能的数据有限,尤其是高通量SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR系统的性能。我们使用389份鼻咽标本分析了两种高通量系统(cobas 6800和Panther Fusion)及其相关RT-PCR检测方法的诊断性能。两个平台之间的总体一致性为96.4%(375/389)。科恩kappa分析将两个平台之间的一致性强度评为“几乎完美”(κ = 0.922;标准误差,0.051)。此外,两个系统产生的相应循环阈值之间没有显著差异(值 = 0.88;学生t检验)。综上所述,这些数据表明这两个平台在临床性能方面可被视为具有可比性。我们相信,这些信息对于那些已经采用这些平台或正在寻求实施高通量RT-PCR检测以遏制SARS-CoV-2大流行的人将是有用的。