Suppr超能文献

价值导向记忆中的个体差异。

Individual differences in value-directed remembering.

作者信息

Elliott Blake L, McClure Samuel M, Brewer Gene A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States of America.

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, United States of America.

出版信息

Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104275. Epub 2020 May 5.

Abstract

Capacity limits in cognition require that valuable information be prioritized for encoding and retrieval. Individual differences in prioritized value-directed encoding may derive from differences in the general ability to encode memories, or from differences in how strategies are altered for different stimuli to modulate maintenance in working memory. We collected multiple cognitive ability measures to test whether variation in episodic memory, working memory capacity, or both predict differences in value-directed remembering among a large sample of participants (n = 205). Confirmatory factor analysis and structural equation modeling was used to assess the contributions of episodic and working memory to value sensitivity in value-directed remembering tasks. Episodic memory ability, but not working memory capacity, was predictive of value-directed remembering. These results suggest that the ability to prioritize memory derives principally from episodic memory ability overall, so that greater capacity also permits greater flexibility.

摘要

认知中的容量限制要求对有价值的信息进行编码和检索时要区分优先级。优先级导向的价值编码中的个体差异可能源于记忆编码一般能力的差异,或者源于针对不同刺激改变策略以调节工作记忆中信息维持方式的差异。我们收集了多种认知能力测量指标,以测试情景记忆、工作记忆容量的变化或两者是否能预测大量参与者(n = 205)中价值导向记忆的差异。使用验证性因素分析和结构方程模型来评估情景记忆和工作记忆对价值导向记忆任务中价值敏感性的贡献。情景记忆能力而非工作记忆容量能够预测价值导向记忆。这些结果表明,区分记忆优先级的能力总体上主要源于情景记忆能力,因此更大的容量也允许更大的灵活性。

相似文献

1
Individual differences in value-directed remembering.
Cognition. 2020 Aug;201:104275. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104275. Epub 2020 May 5.
2
The role of working memory capacity in autobiographical retrieval: individual differences in strategic search.
Memory. 2012;20(2):167-76. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2011.651087. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
3
Individual differences in working memory capacity predict benefits to memory from intention offloading.
Memory. 2022 Feb;30(2):77-91. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2021.1991380. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
4
Individual differences in memory and attention processes in prospective remembering.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2022 Jun;29(3):922-933. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02059-3. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
5
Variation in working memory capacity and episodic memory: examining the importance of encoding specificity.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1113-8. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0165-y.
7
The precuneus and hippocampus contribute to individual differences in the unfolding of spatial representations during episodic autobiographical memory.
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Feb;110:123-133. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.029. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
Episodic future thought: contributions from working memory.
Conscious Cogn. 2013 Sep;22(3):677-83. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2013.04.002. Epub 2013 May 13.
9
Individual Differences in Disqualifying Monitoring Underlie False Recognition of Associative and Conjunction Lures.
Mem Cognit. 2022 May;50(4):751-764. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01243-5. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
10
Variation in working memory capacity and temporal-contextual retrieval from episodic memory.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Nov;37(6):1532-9. doi: 10.1037/a0024852. Epub 2011 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Prior Novelty Invigorates Future Mesolimbic Target Detection.
bioRxiv. 2025 Aug 22:2024.12.16.628816. doi: 10.1101/2024.12.16.628816.
2
Value-Directed Remembering: A Dual-Process Perspective.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Aug 17;15(8):1113. doi: 10.3390/bs15081113.
3
Memory accessibility as a cue for perceived importance.
Mem Cognit. 2025 Aug 6. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01772-3.
5
Memory selectivity in younger and older adults: The role of conative factors in value-directed remembering.
Psychol Aging. 2025 Jun;40(4):371-390. doi: 10.1037/pag0000885. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
7
Responsible remembering: The role of metacognition, forgetting, attention, and retrieval in adaptive memory.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):156-175. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02554-9. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
8
Alpha and theta oscillations on a visual strategic processing task in age-related hearing loss.
Front Neurosci. 2024 Jul 16;18:1382613. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1382613. eCollection 2024.
9
Serial and strategic memory processes in younger and older adults.
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2025 Mar;32(2):207-236. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2024.2371177. Epub 2024 Jun 23.
10
The perceived importance of words in large font guides learning and selective memory.
Mem Cognit. 2024 Oct;52(7):1463-1476. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01555-2. Epub 2024 Apr 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Neural correlates underlying the effect of reward value on recognition memory.
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116296. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116296. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
2
Testing Models of Human Declarative Memory at the Single-Neuron Level.
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jun;23(6):510-524. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
3
Individual differences in long-term memory.
Psychol Bull. 2019 Jan;145(1):79-139. doi: 10.1037/bul0000176.
4
Minimal memory for details in real life events.
Sci Rep. 2018 Nov 12;8(1):16701. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33792-2.
5
Novelty-Sensitive Dopaminergic Neurons in the Human Substantia Nigra Predict Success of Declarative Memory Formation.
Curr Biol. 2018 May 7;28(9):1333-1343.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Recognizing What Matters: Value Improves Recognition by Selectively Enhancing Recollection.
J Mem Lang. 2017 Jun;94:195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.004. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
7
8
Test expectancy and memory for important information.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2017 Jun;43(6):972-985. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000360. Epub 2017 Jan 16.
9
Reward retroactively enhances memory consolidation for related items.
Learn Mem. 2016 Dec 15;24(1):65-69. doi: 10.1101/lm.042978.116. Print 2017 Jan.
10
Post-learning Hippocampal Dynamics Promote Preferential Retention of Rewarding Events.
Neuron. 2016 Mar 2;89(5):1110-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验